Which monitor is better? Compare two
636 new monitors to compare on price, score and specs; collected 12 Nov.
Pick a size. Applies to all pages ·
636 new monitors, catalog as of 12 Nov 2026. The page address saves your choice.
- No proven discountscore 5.9score 5.9
AOC
24G42HE$185
Best price at Amazonchecked today
Why
Who it’s forTwo monitors
Pros71% below similar
ConsNo height adjustment
- No proven discountscore 9.0score 9.0
LG
39GX950B$2,200
Best price at Amazonchecked today
Why
Who it’s forCreative work (photo and video)
Pros142 ppi · above average
AAOC 24G42HE
BLG 39GX950B
AOC 24G42HE wins in 1 field, LG 39GX950B in 9.
What each one has that the other lacks
- AAOC 24G42HEwins in 1
- BLG 39GX950Bwins in 9
- Collected price: AOC 24G42HE wins with $185 against $2,200, $2,015 less. The price collected today, from a trusted seller.
- Spec sheet score: LG 39GX950B wins with 9.0 against 5.9, +3.1 pts. Sum of image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency.
- image score: LG 39GX950B wins with 8.3 against 4.5, +3.8 pts.
- smoothness score: LG 39GX950B wins with 10.0 against 8.0, +2.0 pts.
- connections score: LG 39GX950B wins with 9.0 against 5.0, +4.0 pts.
- Pixel density: LG 39GX950B wins with 142 ppi against 92 ppi, +50 ppi. Sharper text and images.
- Refresh rate: LG 39GX950B wins with 330 Hz against 200 Hz, +130 Hz. More frames per second by the specs.
- Response time (stated): LG 39GX950B wins with 0.0 ms against 0.3 ms, +0.3 ms. Number stated by the manufacturer; GtG and MPRT can’t be compared.
- HDMI ports: LG 39GX950B wins with 2 against 1, +1. More HDMI ports.
- DisplayPort ports: LG 39GX950B wins with 2 against 1, +1. More DisplayPort ports.
See full specsHide specs
| Field | AOC 24G42HE | LG 39GX950B |
|---|---|---|
| Price and score | ||
| Collected price | $185 | $2,200 |
| Spec sheet score | 5.9 | 9.0 |
| Score by component | ||
| image score | 4.5 | 8.3 |
| smoothness score | 8.0 | 10.0 |
| connections score | 5.0 | 9.0 |
| ergonomics score | 3.0 | no data |
| recency score | 8.5 | no data |
| Spec sheet | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Screen size | 24.0 ″ | 39.0 ″ |
| Colour | no data | no data |
| Release year | 2025 | no data |
| Image | ||
| Resolution | Full HD | WUHD |
| Pixel density | 92 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Panel | IPS | OLED |
| Stated HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Curved screen | no | yes |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate | 200 Hz | 330 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 0.3 ms | 0.0 ms |
| Sync | G-Sync | G-SYNC |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 2 |
| USB-C | no data | yes |
| USB-C with laptop charging | no data | yes |
| Built-in speaker | no | no data |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | no | no data |
| Pivot (portrait mode) | no | no data |
| VESA mount holes | yes | no data |
Prices as of 12/11, they may change at the store. Score by specs, from 0 to 10. How we calculate →
Next step
Still undecided between the two?
See where each one stands among all the new monitors, by price and score.
Frequently asked questions
What does the comparison show?
Price, spec sheet score, the score for each component (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency) and the spec sheet. On each row with a rule, we mark the one that wins.
Why do some fields show "no data"?
Because the catalog doesn’t list that detail for the monitor, and we’d rather show the gap than make up a number. A field with no data on one side doesn’t count for either.
Where does the price of each monitor come from?
This is the lowest price from a trusted seller on the date we checked. It changes without notice. The buy button goes straight to the store, where the price of the day applies.
Read next
Where the numbers come from
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. Who wins on each row: the highest value for score and for fields where more is better; the lowest for price. Fields where higher doesn’t mean better appear without marking a winner.
The comparison uses the catalog specs and the Radar spec score. It doesn’t measure the real calibration, durability or what buyers think.
Data from 12 Nov 2026.