Samsung LS27FG810S
Today
Typical price$1,648
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.6 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonSamsung LS27FG810S or Samsung LS27FG900X?
LS27FG810S costs $352 less today; LS27FG900X has score 0.7 higher (7.3 vs. 6.6).
Samsung LS27FG810S
6.6score
Samsung LS27FG900X
7.3score · higher
Samsung LS27FG810S wins 1by componentSamsung LS27FG900X wins 2
- 6.0Image9.0
- 8.5Smoothness5.8
- 5.0Connections6.0
- ·Ergonomics7.0
Samsung LS27FG810S is $352 the cheaperSamsung LS27FG900X is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Only Samsung LS27FG900X works: 144 Hz or more and a stated 1 ms.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Both work. Samsung LS27FG810S is $352 cheaper.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)
Only Samsung LS27FG900X works: QHD or 4K with an IPS or OLED panel.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
LS27FG810S wins on smoothness; LS27FG900X wins on image and connections.
- 6.0Image9.0 (wins)
- 8.5 (wins)Smoothness5.8
- 5.0Connections6.0 (wins)
- N/AErgonomics7.0
Samsung LS27FG900X
Today
Typical price$2,000
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
7.3 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.7
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
LS27FG810S
- Amazon Lowest price$1,648Buy on Amazon
LS27FG900X
- Amazon Lowest price$2,000Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | LS27FG810S | LS27FG900X |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $61.04 menor | $74.07 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | LS27FG810S | LS27FG900X |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 27 ″ | 27 ″ |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Pixel density | 163 ppi | 163 ppi |
| Panel changes | not listed | IPS |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | not listed | Yes |
| Stated HDR changes | not listed | HDR10 |
| Line changes | Odyssey G8 | Odyssey 3D |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 240 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| Response time measurement changes | not listed | GtG |
| Sync changes | Gsync | G-sync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| Built-in speaker changes | not listed | Yes |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | not listed | Yes |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | not listed | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | LS27FG810S | LS27FG900X |
Other comparisons
LS27FG810S orAsus XG27JCG$1,164 · score 5.0Compare
LS27FG900X orSamsung LS27HG702S$1,350 · score 5.1Compare
LS27FG810S orLG 27GS93QE$1,145 · score 5.2Compare
LS27FG900X orMSI 275UPD$360 · score 7.1Compare
LS27FG810S orSamsung LS27FG602E$600 · score 7.4Compare
LS27FG900X orMSI 322UR$1,600 · score 5.9Compare
See more 7 comparisons
- LS27FG810S or Samsung LS27HG702S$1,350 · score 5.1
- LS27FG900X or Samsung LS32HG802S$1,832 · score 6.7
- LS27FG810S or Acer X1BMIIPPRUZX$850 · score 6.6
- LS27FG810S or Asus PA279CDV$899 · score 6.0
- LS27FG810S or MSI 275UPD$360 · score 7.1
- LS27FG810S or Samsung LS27FG706E$800 · score 5.6
- LS27FG810S or Samsung LS27HG802S$998 · score 7.7
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.