MSI 342CQRF
Today
Typical price$479
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.2 out of 10 on the spec sheet +2.5
Buy on AmazonMSI 342CQRF or Samsung LS34HG550E?
MSI 342CQRF costs $41 less today and also has score 2.5 higher (6.2 vs. 3.7).
MSI 342CQRF
6.2score · higher
Samsung LS34HG550E
3.7score
MSI wins 3by componentSamsung wins 0
- 3.7Image2.1
- 9.5Smoothness6.5
- 6.0Connections3.0
- 7.0Ergonomics·
MSI 342CQRF is $41 the cheaperSamsung LS34HG550E is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Both work. MSI 342CQRF is $41 cheaper.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for casual gaming and console, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
MSI 342CQRF wins on image, smoothness and connections.
- 3.7 (wins)Image2.1
- 9.5 (wins)Smoothness6.5
- 6.0 (wins)Connections3.0
- 7.0ErgonomicsN/A
Samsung LS34HG550E
Today
Typical price$520
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
3.7 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
MSI 342CQRF
- Amazon Lowest price$479Buy on Amazon
LS34HG550E
- Amazon Lowest price$520Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | MSI 342CQRF | LS34HG550E |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $14.09 menor | $15.29 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | MSI 342CQRF | LS34HG550E |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type changes | Ultrawide (21:9 or 32:9) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 34 ″ | 34 ″ |
| Resolution changes | UWQHD | QHD |
| Pixel density changes | 110 ppi | 86 ppi |
| Aspect ratio changes | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Stated HDR changes | HDR | HDR10 |
| Line changes | MAG | Odyssey G5 |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 200 Hz | 180 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Sync changes | FreeSync | Freesync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | 1 | not listed |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| Built-in speaker changes | Yes | not listed |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | Yes | not listed |
| VESA mount holes changes | Yes | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | 342CQRF | LS34HG550E |
Other comparisons
MSI 342CQRF orAcer ED340CUR$380 · score 4.7Compare
LS34HG550E orBenQ EX271$351 · score 4.8Compare
MSI 342CQRF orAcer EDA340CUR$391 · score 4.8Compare
LS34HG550E orMSI 275UPD$360 · score 7.1Compare
MSI 342CQRF orAOC CU34G4$449 · score 3.6Compare
LS34HG550E orMSI MP225$97 · score 4.3Compare
See more 15 comparisons
- MSI 342CQRF or Asus VG34VQ3B$310 · score 5.3
- MSI 342CQRF or LG 34G600A$549 · score 5.5
- MSI 342CQRF or LG 34U530A$457 · score 2.3
- MSI 342CQRF or MSI 346CQDF$486 · score 5.2
- MSI 342CQRF or MSI MD342CQP$480 · score 5.1
- MSI 342CQRF or MSI MD342CQPW$490 · score 5.1
- MSI 342CQRF or MSI MP341CQ$316 · score 4.3
- MSI 342CQRF or MSI MP341CQW$329 · score 4.3
- MSI 342CQRF or Samsung LS34H550GA$400 · score 4.2
- MSI 342CQRF or Sceptre QUT168$373 · score 4.5
- MSI 342CQRF or ViewSonic VG3409C$508 · score 3.1
- MSI 342CQRF or ViewSonic VX3418C$441 · score 5.3
- MSI 342CQRF or Acer KG240Y$154 · score 5.5
- MSI 342CQRF or AOC Q27P4CV$503 · score 5.9
- MSI 342CQRF or MSI 275UPD$360 · score 7.1
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.