MSI 341CQR
Today
Typical price$1,300
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.7 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonMSI 341CQR or Samsung LS34C650TANXGO?
LS34C650TANXGO costs $302 less today and also has score 0.5 higher (5.2 vs. 4.7).
MSI 341CQR
4.7score
Samsung LS34C650TANXGO
5.2score · higher
MSI wins 1by componentSamsung wins 2
- 3.7Image4.1
- 8.5Smoothness5.7
- 2.0Connections8.0
- 3.0Ergonomics4.0
MSI 341CQR is the cheaperSamsung LS34C650TANXGO is $302 the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)
Only Samsung LS34C650TANXGO works: QHD or 4K with an IPS or OLED panel.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)Up to $1,500On sale
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors for casual gaming and console, Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
MSI 341CQR wins on smoothness; LS34C650TANXGO wins on connections and ergonomics.
- 3.7Image4.1
- 8.5 (wins)Smoothness5.7
- 2.0Connections8.0 (wins)
- 3.0Ergonomics4.0 (wins)
Samsung LS34C650TANXGO
Today
Typical price$998
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.2 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.5
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
MSI 341CQR
- Amazon Lowest price$1,300Buy on Amazon
LS34C650TANXGO
- Amazon Lowest price$998Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | MSI 341CQR | LS34C650TANXGO |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $38.24 | $29.35 menor |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | MSI 341CQR | LS34C650TANXGO |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type changes | Ultrawide (21:9 or 32:9) | General use and office |
| Size | 34 ″ | 34 ″ |
| Resolution changes | UWQHD | QHD |
| Pixel density changes | 110 ppi | 86 ppi |
| Panel changes | not listed | IPS |
| Aspect ratio changes | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | not listed | Yes |
| Stated HDR changes | HDR | HDR10 |
| Line changes | MPG | ViewFinity S6 |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 360 Hz | 100 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 3 ms | 5 ms |
| Sync changes | not listed | FreeSync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| USB-C changes | not listed | Yes |
| Built-in speaker changes | not listed | Yes |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | not listed | Yes |
| VESA mount holes changes | Yes | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | 341CQR | LS34C650TANXGO |
Other comparisons
MSI 341CQR orSamsung LS34DG850S$1,398 · score 3.5Compare
MSI 341CQR orSamsung LS40H852TA$1,498 · score 3.7Compare- LS34C650TANXGO orSamsung LS34DG850S$1,398 · score 3.5Compare
MSI 341CQR orSamsung LS49F954UA$1,298 · score 3.7Compare
LS34C650TANXGO orSamsung LS40FG756E$1,300 · score 4.2Compare
MSI 341CQR orSamsung LS49FG910E$1,500 · score 5.1Compare
See more 5 comparisons
- LS34C650TANXGO or Samsung LS40H852TA$1,498 · score 3.7
- MSI 341CQR or MSI MP225$97 · score 4.3
- LS34C650TANXGO or Samsung LS49FG910E$1,500 · score 5.1
- MSI 341CQR or Samsung LS27HG702S$1,350 · score 5.1
- MSI 341CQR or Samsung LS32HG802S$1,832 · score 6.7
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.