LG 32U401B
Today
Typical price$216
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.0 out of 10 on the spec sheet +2.0
Buy on AmazonLG 32U401B or Samsung LS32B300NWNXGO?
LS32B300NWNXGO costs $38 less today; LG 32U401B has score 2.0 higher (4.0 vs. 2.0).
LG 32U401B
4.0score · higher
Samsung LS32B300NWNXGO
2.0score
LG wins 1by componentSamsung wins 2
- 1.0Image1.5
- 9.5Smoothness1.8
- 2.0Connections5.0
- ·Ergonomics0.0
LG 32U401B is the cheaperSamsung LS32B300NWNXGO is $38 the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Only LG 32U401B works: 120 Hz or more, 25″ to 32″.
Cheap monitors worth buying
Only LG 32U401B works: Full HD with 100 Hz or more.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
LG 32U401B wins on smoothness; LS32B300NWNXGO wins on connections.
- 1.0Image1.5
- 9.5 (wins)Smoothness1.8
- 2.0Connections5.0 (wins)
- N/AErgonomics0.0
Samsung LS32B300NWNXGO
Today
Typical price$178
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
2.0 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
LG 32U401B
- Amazon Lowest price$216Buy on Amazon
LS32B300NWNXGO
- Amazon Lowest price$178Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | LG 32U401B | LS32B300NWNXGO |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $6.75 | $5.56 menor |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | LG 32U401B | LS32B300NWNXGO |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | General use and office | General use and office |
| Size | 32 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | Full HD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 69 ppi | 69 ppi |
| Panel changes | not listed | VA |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Stated HDR changes | HDR 10 | not listed |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 120 Hz | 75 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 1 ms | not listed |
| Sync changes | not listed | FreeSync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | 32U401B | LS32B300NWNXGO |
Other comparisons
LG 32U401B orAcer SB322QK$270 · score 3.8Compare
LS32B300NWNXGO orAcer EB321HQ$254 · score 0.9Compare
LG 32U401B orAOC C32G2ZE$323 · score 4.2Compare
LS32B300NWNXGO orAsus VA329HE$243 · score 1.0Compare
LG 32U401B orAOC Q32V3S$354 · score 2.4Compare
LS32B300NWNXGO orSamsung LS32FM500E$278 · score 0.9Compare
See more 14 comparisons
- LG 32U401B or LG 29U511A$254 · score 2.8
- LG 32U401B or LG 32G403B$260 · score 3.3
- LG 32U401B or LG 32G600A$318 · score 3.9
- LG 32U401B or LG 32GS60QC$350 · score 4.3
- LG 32U401B or LG 32U631A$300 · score 3.8
- LG 32U401B or LG 32U700B$360 · score 2.8
- LG 32U401B or LG 32U701B$280 · score 3.6
- LG 32U401B or MSI 325CQF$350 · score 4.5
- LG 32U401B or MSI MAG32C6X$290 · score 3.5
- LG 32U401B or Samsung LS32D604UENXGO$340 · score 3.6
- LG 32U401B or Samsung LS32DG302E$310 · score 3.7
- LG 32U401B or Samsung LS32H702EA$348 · score 3.5
- LG 32U401B or Samsung LS32HG350E$300 · score 2.0
- LG 32U401B or ViewSonic VS3225$268 · score 3.4
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.