BenQ PD2706U
Today
Typical price$550
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
8.1 out of 10 on the spec sheet +1.7
Buy on AmazonBenQ PD2706U or MSI 271UPX12G?
BenQ PD2706U costs $290 less today and also has score 1.7 higher (8.1 vs. 6.4).
BenQ PD2706U
8.1score · higher
MSI 271UPX12G
6.4score
BenQ wins 2by componentMSI wins 1
- 9.5Image6.0
- ·Smoothness7.0
- 3.0Connections8.0
- 10.0Ergonomics4.0
- 8.5Recency·
BenQ PD2706U is $290 the cheaperMSI 271UPX12G is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for work and study
Both work. BenQ PD2706U is $290 cheaper.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Only MSI 271UPX12G works: 120 Hz or more, 25″ to 32″.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)
Only BenQ PD2706U works: QHD or 4K with an IPS or OLED panel.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)Up to $1,000On sale
Neither one fits: Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
BenQ PD2706U wins on image and ergonomics; 271UPX12G wins on connections.
- 9.5 (wins)Image6.0
- N/ASmoothness7.0
- 3.0Connections8.0 (wins)
- 10.0 (wins)Ergonomics4.0
- 8.5RecencyN/A
MSI 271UPX12G
Today
Typical price$840
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.4 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
BenQ PD2706U
- Amazon Lowest price$550Buy on Amazon
271UPX12G
- Amazon Lowest price$840Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | BenQ PD2706U | 271UPX12G |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $20.37 menor | $31.12 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | BenQ PD2706U | 271UPX12G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | General use and office | General use and office |
| Size | 27 ″ | 27 ″ |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Pixel density | 163 ppi | 163 ppi |
| Panel changes | IPS | not listed |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | No | not listed |
| Stated HDR changes | HDR 400 | not listed |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | not listed | 120 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 5 ms | not listed |
| Response time measurement changes | GtG | not listed |
| Sync changes | FreeSync | FreeSynch |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C with laptop charging changes | Yes | not listed |
| Built-in speaker changes | No | Yes |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | Yes | Yes |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | Yes | not listed |
| VESA mount holes changes | Yes | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | PD2706U | 271UPX12G |
| Release year changes | 2025 | not listed |
Other comparisons
BenQ PD2706U orAcer X1BMIIPPRUZX$850 · score 6.6Compare
271UPX12G orLG DISPLAYHDR1000$1,400 · score 5.7Compare
BenQ PD2706U orAsus PA279CDV$899 · score 6.0Compare- 271UPX12G orAcer X1BMIIPPRUZX$850 · score 6.6Compare
BenQ PD2706U orDell P2725QE$737 · score 7.7Compare
271UPX12G orMSI 275UPD$360 · score 7.1Compare
See more 2 comparisons
- BenQ PD2706U or Dell U2724DE$850 · score 6.5
- 271UPX12G or Samsung LS27HG802S$998 · score 7.7
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.