Asus XG27ACS
Today
Typical price$369
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.7 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.2
Buy on AmazonAsus XG27ACS or Gigabyte M27Q2?
Gigabyte M27Q2 costs $130 less today; Asus XG27ACS has score 0.2 higher (5.7 vs. 5.5).
Asus XG27ACS
5.7score · higher
Gigabyte M27Q2
5.5score
Asus wins 1by componentGigabyte wins 2
- 5.6Image6.1
- 6.5Smoothness7.5
- 2.0Connections2.0
- 10.0Ergonomics4.0
Asus XG27ACS is the cheaperGigabyte M27Q2 is $130 the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Both work. Gigabyte M27Q2 is $130 cheaper.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Both work. Gigabyte M27Q2 is $130 cheaper.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)
Both work. Gigabyte M27Q2 is $130 cheaper.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)Up to $550On sale
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
Asus XG27ACS wins on ergonomics; Gigabyte M27Q2 wins on smoothness.
- 5.6Image6.1
- 6.5Smoothness7.5 (wins)
- 2.0Connections2.0
- 10.0 (wins)Ergonomics4.0
Gigabyte M27Q2
Today
Typical price$239
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
Asus XG27ACS
- Amazon Lowest price$369Buy on Amazon
Gigabyte M27Q2
- Amazon Lowest price$239Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | Asus XG27ACS | Gigabyte M27Q2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $13.65 | $8.84 menor |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | Asus XG27ACS | Gigabyte M27Q2 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 27 ″ | 27 ″ |
| Resolution | QHD | QHD |
| Pixel density | 109 ppi | 109 ppi |
| Panel | IPS | IPS |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen | No | No |
| Stated HDR changes | HDR | HDR 400 |
| Line changes | ROG | not listed |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 180 Hz | 200 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Sync changes | G-SYNC | Freesync |
| Connections | ||
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | Yes | Yes |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | Yes | not listed |
| VESA mount holes changes | Yes | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | XG27ACS | M27Q2 |
Other comparisons
Asus XG27ACS orAsus PA278QV$329 · score 3.9Compare
Gigabyte M27Q2 orAcer B277$230 · score 2.6Compare
Asus XG27ACS orAcer DISPLAYHDR400$401 · score 3.4Compare
Gigabyte M27Q2 orAcer ED270$176 · score 4.8Compare
Asus XG27ACS orMSI MP225$97 · score 4.3Compare
Gigabyte M27Q2 orAcer EK271$170 · score 5.3Compare
See more 52 comparisons
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Acer KB270U$200 · score 4.6
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Acer KG270$186 · score 4.2
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Acer KG271$255 · score 4.7
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Acer KG271U$250 · score 5.0
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Acer SB270$165 · score 3.9
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Acer SH272$180 · score 3.9
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Acer VG270$200 · score 2.7
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or AOC 27G42E$251 · score 4.0
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or AOC 27G4ZR$269 · score 5.0
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or AOC 3-YEAR$176 · score 3.6
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or AOC C27G4ZH$200 · score 5.0
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or AOC Q27G4XY$255 · score 2.9
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Asus VA279QG$189 · score 3.7
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Asus VA279QGSE$199 · score 4.5
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Asus VA27DQSB$219 · score 2.9
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Asus VA27EHF2$170 · score 4.7
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Asus VG257Q5A$199 · score 3.4
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Asus VG259QM5A$233 · score 4.7
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Asus VG277Q1A$269 · score 3.3
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Asus VZ27EHF$190 · score 3.2
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Asus XG279CNS$388 · score 3.1
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or BenQ GW2790C$254 · score 1.5
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or BenQ GW2790TC$205 · score 1.5
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or BenQ GW2791$233 · score 2.9
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or HP 327SE$250 · score 1.9
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or HP 527SA$264 · score 2.1
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Lenovo L27-4E$164 · score 2.8
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or LG 27G414B$185 · score 3.6
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or LG 27G610A$230 · score 4.9
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or LG 27U411A$170 · score 3.6
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or LG 27U411B$170 · score 3.7
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or MSI 272F$190 · score 3.8
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or MSI 274CF$200 · score 4.9
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or MSI 274QF$240 · score 4.5
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or MSI 275CF$200 · score 4.4
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or MSI 275CQF$160 · score 4.2
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or MSI 275QF$240 · score 4.5
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or MSI 275QPF$239 · score 5.0
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or MSI 276CXF$250 · score 5.5
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or MSI MP271$160 · score 4.4
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or MSI MP271CA$158 · score 2.5
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or MSI MP272L$160 · score 3.8
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or MSI MP273$216 · score 3.1
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or MSI MP273Q$208 · score 4.7
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or MSI MP273W$172 · score 4.5
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or MSI MP275$233 · score 4.5
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or MSI MP275PG$222 · score 4.3
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Samsung LS27D402GANXGO$218 · score 3.3
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Samsung LS27FM500E$248 · score 1.1
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Samsung LS27HG300E$250 · score 3.9
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or Samsung LS27HG314E$210 · score 2.3
- Gigabyte M27Q2 or ViewSonic VS2725$197 · score 3.8
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.