Asus VA249QG
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.0 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.8
Buy on AmazonUpdated 12 Nov 2026
Asus VA249QG costs $1 less today and also has score 0.8 higher (4.0 vs. 3.2).
4.0score · higher
3.2score
Asus wins 1by componentBenQ wins 0
Asus VA249QG is $1 the cheaperBenQ GW2491 is the cheaper
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Both work. Asus VA249QG is $1 cheaper.
Both work. Asus VA249QG is $1 cheaper.
Both work. Asus VA249QG is $1 cheaper.
Neither one fits: Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors for casual gaming and console, Monitors for creative work (photo and video).
Asus VA249QG wins on smoothness.
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.0 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.8
Buy on AmazonAmazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
3.2 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Updated 12/11/2026
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | Asus VA249QG | BenQ GW2491 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $4.96 menor | $5.00 |
| Item | Asus VA249QG | BenQ GW2491 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | General use and office | General use and office |
| Size | 24 ″ | 24 ″ |
| Resolution | Full HD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 92 ppi | 92 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 120 Hz | 100 Hz |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | VA249QG | GW2491 |
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.