AOC 3-YEAR
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
3.6 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonUpdated 12 Nov 2026
LG 27U411A costs $6 less today, with the same spec sheet score (3.6).
3.6score
3.6score
AOC wins 1by componentLG wins 1
AOC 3-YEAR is the cheaperLG 27U411A is $6 the cheaper
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Only LG 27U411A works: General use, 23″ to 27″.
Only AOC 3-YEAR works: 144 Hz or more and a stated 1 ms.
Both work. LG 27U411A is $6 cheaper.
Both work. LG 27U411A is $6 cheaper.
Neither one fits: Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk.
AOC 3-YEAR wins on connections; LG 27U411A wins on smoothness.
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
3.6 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAmazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
3.6 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Updated 12/11/2026
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | AOC 3-YEAR | LG 27U411A |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $6.52 | $6.30 menor |
| Item | AOC 3-YEAR | LG 27U411A |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type changes | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | General use and office |
| Size | 27 ″ | 27 ″ |
| Resolution | Full HD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 82 ppi | 82 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Stated HDR changes | HDR | HDR10 |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 0.5 ms | not listed |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | 1 | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | 3-YEAR | 27U411A |
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.