Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated 12 Nov 2026

Acer XV275K or LG 27GR83Q?

Acer XV275K costs $295 less today and also has score 0.7 higher (5.8 vs. 5.1).

Acer XV275K

5.8score · higher

LG 27GR83Q

5.1score

Acer wins 1by componentLG wins 1

  • 6.0Image2.6
  • 6.0Smoothness9.5
  • 5.0Connections5.0
  • ·Ergonomics3.0

Acer XV275K is $295 the cheaper

The best for each use

By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.

Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Acer XV275K wins on image; LG 27GR83Q wins on smoothness.

  • 6.0 (wins)Image2.6
  • 6.0Smoothness9.5 (wins)
  • 5.0Connections5.0
  • N/AErgonomics3.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 12/11/2026

Acer XV275K
LG 27GR83Q

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathAcer XV275KLG 27GR83Q
Price per inch$16.58 menor$27.53

Spec sheet side by side

ItemAcer XV275KLG 27GR83Q
Screen
TypeGaming (144 Hz or more)Gaming (144 Hz or more)
Size27 ″27 ″
Resolution changes4KQHD
Pixel density changes163 ppi109 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Line changesNitroUltraGear
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes160 Hz240 Hz
Response time (stated) changes0.5 ms1 ms
SyncFreeSyncFreeSync
Connections
HDMI ports11
DisplayPort ports11
Ergonomics
Pivot (portrait mode) changesnot listedYes
General
Model code changesXV275K27GR83Q

Other comparisons

See more 1 comparison
How we choose

Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.