Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Acer UT222Q or MSI MP225?

MSI MP225 costs $288 less today and also has score 1.5 higher (4.3 vs. 2.8).

Acer UT222Q

2.8score

MSI MP225

4.3score · higher

Acer wins 1by componentMSI wins 1

  • 2.0Image2.0
  • 2.8Smoothness9.5
  • 5.0Connections2.0
  • ·Ergonomics3.0

MSI MP225 is $288 the cheaper

$385

today

No history yet

$97

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Acer UT222Q wins on connections; MSI MP225 wins on smoothness.

  • 2.0Image2.0
  • 2.8Smoothness9.5 (wins)
  • 5.0 (wins)Connections2.0
  • N/AErgonomics3.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Acer UT222Q
MSI MP225

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathAcer UT222QMSI MP225
Price per inch$17.51$4.41 menor

Spec sheet side by side

ItemAcer UT222QMSI MP225
Screen
TypeGeneral use and officeGeneral use and office
Size22 ″22 ″
ResolutionFull HDFull HD
Pixel density100 ppi100 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes75 Hz120 Hz
Response time (stated) changes5 ms1 ms
Sync changesFreeSyncnot listed
Connections
HDMI ports11
DisplayPort ports changes1not listed
Ergonomics
VESA mount holes changesnot listedYes
General
Model code changesUT222QMP225

Other comparisons

See more 214 comparisons
How we choose

Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.