Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Acer UT222Q or Asus XG279CNS?

XG279CNS costs $19 less today and also has score 0.3 higher (3.1 vs. 2.8).

Acer UT222Q

2.8score

Asus XG279CNS

3.1score · higher

Acer wins 2by componentAsus wins 1

  • 2.0Image0.8
  • 2.8Smoothness7.0
  • 5.0Connections2.0

Asus XG279CNS is $19 the cheaper

$385

today

No history yet

$366

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Acer UT222Q wins on image and connections; XG279CNS wins on smoothness.

  • 2.0 (wins)Image0.8
  • 2.8Smoothness7.0 (wins)
  • 5.0 (wins)Connections2.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Acer UT222Q
XG279CNS

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathAcer UT222QXG279CNS
Price per inch$17.51$13.54 menor

Spec sheet side by side

ItemAcer UT222QXG279CNS
Screen
Type changesGeneral use and officeGaming (144 Hz or more)
Size changes22 ″27 ″
ResolutionFull HDFull HD
Pixel density changes100 ppi82 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Line changesnot listedROG
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes75 Hz380 Hz
Response time (stated) changes5 msnot listed
Sync changesFreeSyncnot listed
Connections
HDMI ports changes1not listed
DisplayPort ports changes1not listed
USB-C changesnot listedYes
General
Model code changesUT222QXG279CNS

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.