Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Acer KG240Y or Samsung LS32FG500E?

Acer KG240Y costs $114 less today and also has score 1.6 higher (5.5 vs. 3.9).

Acer KG240Y

5.5score · higher

Acer wins 2by componentSamsung wins 0

  • 2.5Image2.5
  • 10.0Smoothness6.5
  • 5.0Connections3.0

Acer KG240Y is $114 the cheaper

$154

today

No history yet

$268

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Acer KG240Y wins on smoothness and connections.

  • 2.5Image2.5
  • 10.0 (wins)Smoothness6.5
  • 5.0 (wins)Connections3.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Acer KG240Y
LS32FG500E

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathAcer KG240YLS32FG500E
Price per inch$6.42 menor$8.38

Spec sheet side by side

ItemAcer KG240YLS32FG500E
Screen
TypeGaming (144 Hz or more)Gaming (144 Hz or more)
Size changes24 ″32 ″
Resolution changesFull HDQHD
Pixel density92 ppi92 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Stated HDR changesHDR 10HDR10
Line changesNitroOdyssey G5
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes240 Hz180 Hz
Response time (stated) changes0.5 ms1 ms
Sync changesFreeSyncG-Sync
Connections
HDMI ports changes1not listed
DisplayPort ports11
General
Model code changesKG240YLS32FG500E

Other comparisons

See more 141 comparisons
How we choose

Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.