Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Updated today

Acer KG240Y or MSI MD342CQP?

  • Cheapest todayAcer KG240Y$334 less
  • Higher spec sheet scoreAcer KG240Y5.5 vs. 5.1

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Score by component, side by side

Acer KG240Y wins on smoothness; MD342CQP wins on connections.

  • 2.5Image2.7
  • 10.0 (wins)Smoothness6.0
  • 5.0Connections8.0 (wins)
  • N/AErgonomics7.0

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Acer KG240Y
MD342CQP

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathAcer KG240YMD342CQP
Price per inch$6.42 menor$14.37

Ficha técnica lado a lado

ItemAcer KG240YMD342CQP
Screen
Type changesGaming (144 Hz or more)Ultrawide (21:9 or 32:9)
Size changes24 ″34 ″
Resolution changesFull HDUWQHD
Pixel density changes92 ppi110 ppi
Aspect ratio changes16:921:9
Curved screen changesnot listedYes
Stated HDR changesHDR 10not listed
Line changesNitronot listed
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes240 Hz120 Hz
Response time (stated) changes0.5 ms1 ms
Sync changesFreeSyncnot listed
Connections
HDMI ports11
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C changesnot listedYes
Built-in speaker changesnot listedYes
Ergonomics
Height adjustment changesnot listedYes
VESA mount holes changesnot listedYes
General
Model code changesKG240YMD342CQP

Other comparisons

See more 140 comparisons
How we choose

Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.