Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated 12 Nov 2026

Acer KB220Q or Asus VP227HF?

Asus VP227HF costs $1 less today; Acer KB220Q has score 0.8 higher (3.7 vs. 2.9).

Acer KB220Q

3.7score · higher

Asus VP227HF

2.9score

Acer wins 1by componentAsus wins 0

  • 2.0Image2.0
  • 7.2Smoothness4.7
  • 2.0Connections2.0

Asus VP227HF is $1 the cheaper

The best for each use

By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.

Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors for casual gaming and console, Monitors for creative work (photo and video).

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Acer KB220Q wins on smoothness.

  • 2.0Image2.0
  • 7.2 (wins)Smoothness4.7
  • 2.0Connections2.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 12/11/2026

Acer KB220Q
Asus VP227HF

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathAcer KB220QAsus VP227HF
Price per inch$5.00$4.95 menor

Spec sheet side by side

ItemAcer KB220QAsus VP227HF
Screen
TypeGeneral use and officeGeneral use and office
Size22 ″22 ″
ResolutionFull HDFull HD
Pixel density100 ppi100 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Smoothness
Refresh rate100 Hz100 Hz
Response time (stated) changes1 msnot listed
Sync changesFreeSyncnot listed
Connections
HDMI ports11
General
Model code changesKB220QVP227HF

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.