Acer ED300C
Today
Typical price$231
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.4 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAcer ED300C or LG 32G621B?
Acer ED300C costs $109 less today; LG 32G621B has score 0.3 higher (4.7 vs. 4.4).
Acer ED300C
4.4score
LG 32G621B
4.7score · higher
Acer wins 0by componentLG wins 1
- 1.9Image2.5
- 7.5Smoothness7.5
- 5.0Connections5.0
Acer ED300C is $109 the cheaperLG 32G621B is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Both work. Acer ED300C is $109 cheaper.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Both work. Acer ED300C is $109 cheaper.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
Neither one opens a 1-point lead on any component.
- 1.9Image2.5
- 7.5Smoothness7.5
- 5.0Connections5.0
LG 32G621B
Today
Typical price$340
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.7 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.3
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
Acer ED300C
- Amazon Lowest price$231Buy on Amazon
LG 32G621B
- Amazon Lowest price$340Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | Acer ED300C | LG 32G621B |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $7.71 menor | $10.62 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | Acer ED300C | LG 32G621B |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size changes | 30 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | QHD | QHD |
| Pixel density changes | 98 ppi | 92 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | Yes | not listed |
| Stated HDR changes | not listed | HDR10 |
| Line changes | Nitro | UltraGear |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate | 200 Hz | 200 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Sync changes | FreeSync | G-SYNC |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | ED300C | 32G621B |
Other comparisons
Acer ED300C orAcer EB321HQ$254 · score 0.9Compare
LG 32G621B orAOC Q32E4U$551 · score 4.4Compare
Acer ED300C orAcer SB322QK$270 · score 3.8Compare
LG 32G621B orLG 32G600A$318 · score 3.9Compare
Acer ED300C orAsus VA329HE$243 · score 1.0Compare
LG 32G621B orLG 32U631A$300 · score 3.8Compare
See more 20 comparisons
- Acer ED300C or LG 29U511A$254 · score 2.8
- LG 32G621B or LG 32U701B$280 · score 3.6
- Acer ED300C or LG 32G403B$260 · score 3.3
- LG 32G621B or MSI MAG32C6X$290 · score 3.5
- LG 32G621B or Samsung LS32DG302E$310 · score 3.7
- Acer ED300C or MSI 321CQF$381 · score 3.8
- LG 32G621B or Samsung LS32FM500E$278 · score 0.9
- Acer ED300C or Samsung LS32B300NWNXGO$178 · score 2.0
- LG 32G621B or Samsung LS32HG350E$300 · score 2.0
- Acer ED300C or ViewSonic VA3209M$228 · score 1.7
- LG 32G621B or BenQ EX251$331 · score 4.6
- Acer ED300C or ViewSonic VS3225$268 · score 3.4
- LG 32G621B or MSI 275UPD$360 · score 7.1
- Acer ED300C or Acer KG240Y$154 · score 5.5
- LG 32G621B or MSI MP225$97 · score 4.3
- Acer ED300C or MSI 274QF$240 · score 4.5
- Acer ED300C or MSI 275QF$240 · score 4.5
- Acer ED300C or MSI MP225$97 · score 4.3
- Acer ED300C or MSI MP273QW$240 · score 5.2
- Acer ED300C or MSI MP275W$225 · score 4.5
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.