197% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 52 models with a score between 4.8 and 5.8 have a median price of £229.
Updated 6 Nov, 2026
£679
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
5.3out of 10
On 06/11, the lowest price for the monitor Asus PG32UCDP was £679 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price changes throughout the day: the current lowest price and the last 30 days of history are updated in real time on Monitor Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 06/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is £679.
Updated 06/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 5.3 of 10 Above the median on 1 componente, tiedthe in 1, below on 1.
No data on the spec sheet: ergonomics and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
197% above
The 52 models with a score between 4.8 and 5.8 have a median price of £229.
#8 of 15
Among the 15 models in the Over £600 range, the median score is 5.3.
1 weakness
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
£21.22 per inch
The 102 models from 28 to 34 inches cost £8.28 per inch (median). Math: £679 ÷ 32 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Asus VG249Q5R wins on connections (6.0 vs. 2.0)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
BenQ EX271UZ wins on connections (7.0 vs. 2.0)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
MSI 341CQP wins on connections (5.0 vs. 2.0)
Compare side by sideSamsung
LS32HG802SUXXU£649
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Asus
XG32UCWMG£674
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
MSI
341CQP£694
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | 4K |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Line | ROG Swift |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 3 ms |
| Sync | G-SYNC |
| Connections | |
| USB-C | Yes |
| General | |
| Model code | PG32UCDP |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, curved screen, stated hdr, response time measurement, hdmi ports, displayport ports, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), vesa mount holes, colour and release year.
In 6 November 2026, Asus PG32UCDP costs £679 (score 5.3); the range median is £757 across 15 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
On 6 Nov 2026, the collected price of Asus PG32UCDP is £679. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 52 models with a score between 4.8 and 5.8 have a median price of £229, and Asus PG32UCDP costs £679, 197% above. In the Over £600 range, the median score of the 15 models is 5.3; Asus PG32UCDP's is 5.3, at the median, the 8º among them. By the spec sheet, the weak point is Connections (2.0, vs. 5.0 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point above the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
The catalog confirms 144 Hz or more, 4K and USB-C. Not confirmed in the specs: QHD, IPS, OLED, curved screen and height adjustment. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.