176% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 39 models with a score between 5.1 and 6.1 have a median price of $290.
Updated Nov 12, 2026
$800
checked today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
5.6out of 10
On 12/11, the best price of the day for the monitor Gigabyte MO32U24 was $800 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price and the cheapest store change all the time; here you see the best one from the last check (in 12/11). The price shown is the one from the last check.
Updated 12/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 5.6 of 10 Above the median on 1 componente, tiedthe in 2, below on 1.
No data on the spec sheet: recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
176% above
The 39 models with a score between 5.1 and 6.1 have a median price of $290.
#7 of 25
Among the 25 models in the $400 to $800 range, the median score is 4.9.
1 weakness
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$25.00 per inch
The 106 models from 28 to 34 inches cost $8.96 per inch (median). Math: $800 ÷ 32 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Gigabyte MO32U24 wins on smoothness (8.5 vs. 1.0)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
LG 32GX850A wins on ergonomics (10.0 vs. 3.0)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
MSI 321UP wins on ergonomics (7.0 vs. 3.0)
Compare side by sideLG
32GX850A$752
See price in the store
Who it’s forCreative work (photo and video)
Pros138 ppi · above average
Cons3.0 ms · above average
LG
34GX90SA$779
checked today
Who it’s forCompetitive gaming
Pros240 Hz · above average · VESA
Cons86 ppi · below average
LG
32GX870A$820$837
2% below the previous check
checked today
Who it’s forCasual gaming and console
Pros138 ppi · above average
Cons3.0 ms · above average
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | 4K |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 3 ms |
| Sync | FreeSync |
| Connections | |
| HDMI ports | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 |
| Ergonomics | |
| Pivot (portrait mode) | Yes |
| General | |
| Model code | MO32U24 |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, curved screen, stated hdr, line, response time measurement, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, vesa mount holes, color and release year.
In November 12, 2026, Gigabyte MO32U24 costs $800 (score 5.6); the range median is $650 across 25 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
Today's best price is $800, checked in 12/11.
On Nov 12, 2026, the collected price of Gigabyte MO32U24 is $800. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 39 models with a score between 5.1 and 6.1 have a median price of $290, and Gigabyte MO32U24 costs $800, 176% above. In the $400 to $800 range, the median score of the 25 models is 4.9; Gigabyte MO32U24's is 5.6, above the previous check, the 7º among them. By the spec sheet, the weak point is Ergonomics (3.0, vs. 4.0 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point above the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
The catalog confirms 144 Hz or more and 4K. Not confirmed in the specs: QHD, IPS, OLED, USB-C, curved screen and height adjustment. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.