136% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 51 models with a score between 3.7 and 4.7 have a median price of $190.
Updated Nov 6, 2026
$448
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
4.2out of 10
On 06/11, the lowest price for the monitor Asus XG27UCG was $448 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price changes throughout the day: the current lowest price and the last 30 days of history are updated in real time on Monitor Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 06/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is $448.
Updated 06/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 4.2 of 10 Above the median on 1 componente, below on 2.
No data on the spec sheet: ergonomics and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
136% above
The 51 models with a score between 3.7 and 4.7 have a median price of $190.
#17 of 22
Among the 22 models in the $400 to $800 range, the median score is 4.7.
+2.7 in image
Pixel density (resolution divided by screen size), panel type (OLED, IPS, VA, TN) and stated HDR above what the range delivers.
2 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$16.59 per inch
The 247 models from 24 to 30 inches cost $6.63 per inch (median). Math: $448 ÷ 27 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Asus XG27UCG wins on image (6.0 vs. 2.0)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
MSI 274URDFW wins on smoothness (10.0 vs. 3.0)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
LG 37G800A wins on connections (5.0 vs. 2.0)
Compare side by sideMSI
272QP$400
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Samsung
LS32D606UANXGO$420
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Innocn
CB27U1$475
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 27 ″ |
| Resolution | 4K |
| Pixel density | 163 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Line | ROG |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 160 Hz |
| Sync | G-SYNC |
| Connections | |
| USB-C | Yes |
| General | |
| Model code | XG27UCG |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, curved screen, stated hdr, response time (stated), response time measurement, hdmi ports, displayport ports, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), vesa mount holes, color and release year.
In November 6, 2026, Asus XG27UCG costs $448 (score 4.2); the range median is $580 across 22 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
On Nov 6, 2026, the collected price of Asus XG27UCG is $448. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 51 models with a score between 3.7 and 4.7 have a median price of $190, and Asus XG27UCG costs $448, 136% above. In the $400 to $800 range, the median score of the 22 models is 4.7; Asus XG27UCG's is 4.2, below the median, the 17º among them. By the specs, the strong point is Image (6.0, vs. 3.3 at the range median) and the weak one is Smoothness (3.0, vs. 7.0 at the range median). The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
The catalog confirms 144 Hz or more, 4K and USB-C. Not confirmed in the specs: QHD, IPS, OLED, curved screen and height adjustment. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.