Gigabyte MO32U24
Today
Previous check$800
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.6 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonGigabyte MO32U24 or LG 32GX850A?
32GX850A costs $48 less today and also has score 0.9 higher (6.5 vs. 5.6).
Gigabyte MO32U24
5.6score
LG 32GX850A
6.5score · higher
Gigabyte wins 1by componentLG wins 3
- 4.5Image7.0
- 8.5Smoothness4.8
- 5.0Connections6.0
- 3.0Ergonomics10.0
Gigabyte MO32U24 is the cheaperLG 32GX850A is $48 the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Both work. LG 32GX850A is $48 cheaper.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)
Only LG 32GX850A works: QHD or 4K with an IPS or OLED panel.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
Gigabyte MO32U24 wins on smoothness; 32GX850A wins on image, connections and ergonomics.
- 4.5Image7.0 (wins)
- 8.5 (wins)Smoothness4.8
- 5.0Connections6.0 (wins)
- 3.0Ergonomics10.0 (wins)
LG 32GX850A
Today
Previous check$752
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.9
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
Gigabyte MO32U24
- Amazon Lowest price$800Buy on Amazon
32GX850A
- Amazon Lowest price$752Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | Gigabyte MO32U24 | 32GX850A |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $25.00 | $23.50 menor |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | Gigabyte MO32U24 | 32GX850A |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 32 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 138 ppi |
| Panel changes | not listed | OLED |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | not listed | No |
| Line changes | not listed | UltraGear |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 240 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 3 ms | 3 ms |
| Response time measurement changes | not listed | GtG |
| Sync changes | FreeSync | G-SYNC |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| Built-in speaker changes | not listed | Yes |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | not listed | Yes |
| Pivot (portrait mode) | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount holes changes | not listed | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | MO32U24 | 32GX850A |
Other comparisons
32GX850A orBenQ MA320U$650 · score 3.2Compare
32GX850A orMSI 321UP$671 · score 5.0Compare
32GX850A orMSI 322UR$1,072 · score 5.9Compare
32GX850A orMSI 322URX$976 · score 5.8Compare
32GX850A orMSI 274URDFW$489 · score 6.5Compare
32GX850A orMSI 341QPXW14G$750 · score 4.8Compare
See more 1 comparison
- 32GX850A or MSI MP242LE$90 · score 4.1
How we choose
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.