Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 12, 2026

AOC CQ32G4Z or LG 32U631A?

AOC CQ32G4Z costs $20 less today and also has score 0.3 higher (3.7 vs. 3.4).

AOC CQ32G4Z

3.7score · higher

LG 32U631A

3.4score

AOC wins 1by componentLG wins 1

  • 1.5Image2.5
  • 7.0Smoothness5.7
  • ·Connections2.0
  • 3.0Ergonomics·

AOC CQ32G4Z is $20 the cheaper

The best for each use

By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.

Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

AOC CQ32G4Z wins on smoothness; LG 32U631A wins on image.

  • 1.5Image2.5 (wins)
  • 7.0 (wins)Smoothness5.7
  • N/AConnections2.0
  • 3.0ErgonomicsN/A

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 12/11/2026

AOC CQ32G4Z
LG 32U631A

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathAOC CQ32G4ZLG 32U631A
Price per inch$7.19 menor$7.81

Spec sheet side by side

ItemAOC CQ32G4ZLG 32U631A
Screen
Type changesGaming (144 Hz or more)General use and office
Size32 ″32 ″
ResolutionQHDQHD
Pixel density92 ppi92 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curved screen changesYesnot listed
Stated HDR changesnot listedHDR10
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes260 Hz100 Hz
Response time (stated) changesnot listed5 ms
Connections
HDMI ports changesnot listed1
Ergonomics
VESA mount holes changesYesnot listed
General
Model code changesCQ32G4Z32U631A

Other comparisons

See more 2 comparisons
How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.