Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Amzfast 2.0: price today and whether it’s worth it

  1. score 5.0

    49″DQHD120 Hz

    $570

    No history yet · today

    Amazon: the cheapest today

Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money

Is it worth it?

Spec score, from 0 to 10

5.0out of 10

  • Image3.6
  • Smoothness6.0
  • Connections5.0
  • Ergonomics7.0
How we calculate the score

On 06/11, the lowest price for the monitor Amzfast 2.0 was $570 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price changes throughout the day: the current lowest price and the last 30 days of history are updated in real time on Monitor Radar.

The price over the last 30 days

Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 06/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is $570.

Where is it cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

  1. AmazonTrusted sellerLowest price
    $569.99
    Comprar on Amazon

The final price is the one at the store.

Is the monitor any good?

Specs: score 5.0 of 10 Above the median on 2 componentes, tiedthe in 1, below on 1.

Score for each component, from 0 to 10
  • ImagePixel density (resolution divided by screen size), panel type (OLED, IPS, VA, TN) and stated HDR3.6faixa 3.3
  • SmoothnessRefresh rate in Hz, compared with monitors of the same type, and the response time stated by the manufacturer6.0faixa 7.0
  • ConnectionsHDMI and DisplayPort ports, USB-C (with or without laptop charging) and built-in speaker5.0faixa 5.0
  • ErgonomicsHeight adjustment, pivot (rotates to portrait mode) and VESA mount holes for a stand7.0faixa 3.0
  • Score of the Amzfast 2.0
  • Range median

No data on the spec sheet: recency. How we calculate the score

Is Amzfast 2.0 worth it?

By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.

101% above

Costs more than others charge for this score

The 38 models with a score between 4.5 and 5.5 have a median price of $283.

This monitor$570
Median score 4.5 to 5.5$283

#7 of 22

Score above the price range

Among the 22 models in the $400 to $800 range, the median score is 4.7.

This monitor5.0
Range median4.7

+4.0 in ergonomics

Strength: ergonomics

Height adjustment, pivot (rotates to portrait mode) and VESA mount holes for a stand above what the range delivers.

This monitor7.0
Range median3.0

1 weakness

Weakness: smoothness

Difference of each score from the range median:

  • Image+0.3
  • Smoothness-1.0
  • Connections0.0
  • Ergonomics+4.0

Where it sits on the catalog’s price and score map

Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.

Amzfast 2.0 on the price and score map
024683005001 milscoreprice in $
  • Models in the $400 to $800 range
  • Amzfast 2.0
  • Rest of the catalog
  • Best score for the price

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.

$11.63 per inch

38% cheapest per inch

The 18 models from 43 to 52 inches cost $18.83 per inch (median). Math: $570 ÷ 49 inches.

This monitor$11.63
Similar ones$18.83

Compare the Amzfast 2.0 with

Want to see all the monitors of 34″+?There are 80 in today’s catalog, starting at $180.Ver the 80 monitors

Other comparisons with the Amzfast 2.0

See also

Similar to this model (prices as of 06/11)

  1. score 4.8

    27″QHD240 Hz

    $545

    No history yet · today

    Amazon: the cheapest today

  2. score 4.3

    27″QHD280 Hz

    $550

    No history yet · today

    Amazon: the cheapest today

  3. score 4.8

    27″QHD480 Hz

    $580

    No history yet · today

    Amazon: the cheapest today

Full spec sheet

Specs of the single version.
Screen
TypeUltrawide (21:9 or 32:9)
Size49 ″
ResolutionDQHD
Pixel density109 ppi
Aspect ratio32:9
Curved screenYes
Stated HDRHDR
LineUltraWide
Smoothness
Refresh rate120 Hz
Response time (stated)1 ms
Connections
HDMI ports1
DisplayPort ports1
Ergonomics
Height adjustmentYes
VESA mount holesYes
General
Model code2.0

The catalog doesn’t say: panel, response time measurement, sync, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, pivot (portrait mode), color and release year.

How to read these numbers

In November 6, 2026, Amzfast 2.0 costs $570 (score 5.0); the range median is $580 across 22 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.

Frequently asked questions

How much does Amzfast 2.0 cost today?

On Nov 6, 2026, the collected price of Amzfast 2.0 is $570. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.

Is Amzfast 2.0 worth it?

Price counts against it: the 38 models with a score between 4.5 and 5.5 have a median price of $283, and Amzfast 2.0 costs $570, 101% above. In the $400 to $800 range, the median score of the 22 models is 4.7; Amzfast 2.0's is 5.0, above the median, the 7º among them. By the specs, the strong point is Ergonomics (7.0, vs. 3.0 at the range median) and the weak one is Smoothness (6.0, vs. 7.0 at the range median). The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.

What features does Amzfast 2.0 have according to its specs?

The catalog confirms curved screen and height adjustment. Not confirmed in the specs: 144 Hz or more, QHD, 4K, IPS, OLED and USB-C. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.

Read next

How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.