33% below
Costs less than others charge for this score
The 64 models with a score between 3.8 and 4.8 have a median price of $193.
Updated Nov 12, 2026
$129
checked today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
4.3out of 10
On 12/11, the best price of the day for the monitor Acer SB240Y was $129 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price and the cheapest store change all the time; here you see the best one from the last check (in 12/11). The price shown is the one from the last check.
Updated 12/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 4.3 of 10 Above the median on 1 componente, below on 2.
No data on the spec sheet: ergonomics and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, yes: the score of a pricier monitorthe at the price of a cheaper monitorthe.
33% below
The 64 models with a score between 3.8 and 4.8 have a median price of $193.
#23 of 72
Among the 72 models in the $100 to $200 range, the median score is 3.8.
+3.4 in smoothness
Refresh rate in Hz, compared with monitors of the same type, and the response time stated by the manufacturer above what the range delivers.
1 weakness
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$5.38 per inch
The 261 models from 22 to 27 inches cost $7.04 per inch (median). Math: $129 ÷ 24 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Acer SB240Y wins on smoothness (9.5 vs. 4.7)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
AOC 24G4 wins on image (4.5 vs. 1.5)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
Asus VA249QG wins on connections (5.0 vs. 2.0)
Compare side by sideAsus
VA27EHF2$124
checked today
Who it’s forWork and study
Pros12% below similar · VESA
Cons82 ppi · below average
Asus
VG249QE5A$125
checked today
Who it’s forCompetitive gaming
ProsSound
Acer
SH273$130
checked today
Who it’s forCompetitive gaming
ProsHeight
Cons82 ppi · below average
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | General use and office |
| Size | 24 ″ |
| Resolution | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 92 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 1 ms |
| Sync | FreeSync |
| Connections | |
| HDMI ports | 1 |
| General | |
| Model code | SB240Y |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, curved screen, stated hdr, line, response time measurement, displayport ports, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), vesa mount holes, color and release year.
In November 12, 2026, Acer SB240Y costs $129 (score 4.3); the range median is $153 across 72 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
Today's best price is $129, checked in 12/11.
On Nov 12, 2026, the collected price of Acer SB240Y is $129. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts in its favor: the 64 models with a score between 3.8 and 4.8 have a median price of $193, and Acer SB240Y costs $129, 33% below. In the $100 to $200 range, the median score of the 72 models is 3.8; Acer SB240Y's is 4.3, above the previous check, the 23º among them. By the specs, the strong point is Smoothness (9.5, vs. 6.1 at the range median) and the weak one is Connections (2.0, vs. 5.0 at the range median). The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.