Skip to content
Laptop Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Acer Nitro V 16″ Core 7 RTX 5050 or Lenovo LOQ 15.6″ Ryzen 7 170 RTX 4050?

Nitro V 16″ Core 7 RTX 5050 costs $12 less today; LOQ 15.6″ Ryzen 7 170 RTX 4050 has score 0.1 higher (7.5 vs. 7.4).

Acer wins 0by componentLenovo wins 1

  • 7.9Performance7.5
  • 8.3Memory and storage8.3
  • 7.7Screen7.4
  • 3.8Ports and how current it is6.3

Acer Nitro V 16″ Core 7 RTX 5050 is $12 the cheaper

$1,288

today

No history yet

$1,300

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

LOQ 15.6″ Ryzen 7 170 RTX 4050 wins on ports and how current it is.

  • 7.9Performance7.5
  • 8.3Memory and storage8.3
  • 7.7Screen7.4
  • 3.8Ports and how current it is6.3 (wins)

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Spec sheet side by side

ItemNitro V 16″ Core 7 RTX 5050LOQ 15.6″ Ryzen 7 170 RTX 4050
Performance
Processor changesCore 7Ryzen 7
Processor model changesnot listed170
Dedicated graphics card changesRTX 5050RTX 4050
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD
Screen
Size changes16 polegadas15.6 polegadas
ResolutionFull HDFull HD
Screen typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate changes180Hz144Hz
Connections
Wi-Fi generationWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
General
System changesnot listedWindows
Model code changesANV16not listed

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the laptop; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure real-world performance or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.