MSI 491CQPX
Today
Typical price$1,650
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonMSI 491CQPX or Samsung LS32HG802S?
LS32HG802S costs $168 less today and also has score 1.5 higher (7.0 vs. 5.5).
MSI 491CQPX
5.5score
Samsung LS32HG802S
7.0score · higher
MSI wins 0by componentSamsung wins 2
- 2.6Image6.0
- 8.5Smoothness8.5
- 6.0Connections7.0
- 7.0Ergonomics·
MSI 491CQPX is the cheaperSamsung LS32HG802S is $168 the cheaper
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
LS32HG802S wins on image and connections.
- 2.6Image6.0 (wins)
- 8.5Smoothness8.5
- 6.0Connections7.0 (wins)
- 7.0ErgonomicsN/A
Samsung LS32HG802S
Today
Typical price$1,482
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
7.0 out of 10 on the spec sheet +1.5
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 06/11/2026
MSI 491CQPX
- Amazon Lowest price$1,650Buy on Amazon
LS32HG802S
- Amazon Lowest price$1,482Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | MSI 491CQPX | LS32HG802S |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $33.67 menor | $46.33 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | MSI 491CQPX | LS32HG802S |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type changes | Ultrawide (21:9 or 32:9) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size changes | 49 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution changes | DQHD | 4K |
| Pixel density changes | 109 ppi | 138 ppi |
| Aspect ratio changes | 32:9 | 16:9 |
| Stated HDR changes | not listed | HDR 500 |
| Line changes | MPG | Odyssey G8 |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 3 ms | 3 ms |
| Sync changes | not listed | Gsync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C changes | not listed | Yes |
| Built-in speaker changes | Yes | not listed |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | Yes | not listed |
| VESA mount holes changes | Yes | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | 491CQPX | LS32HG802S |
Other comparisons
LS32HG802S orAcer EI491CUR$1,969 · score 5.0Compare
LS32HG802S orAOC C24G42E$1,173 · score 4.0Compare
LS32HG802S orAOC CS24A$1,324 · score 5.5Compare
LS32HG802S orAsus PA32UCG-K$4,515 · score 5.3Compare
LS32HG802S orAsus PA32USD$3,699 · score 5.3Compare
LS32HG802S orBenQ PD3226G$1,150 · score 3.6Compare
See more 23 comparisons
- LS32HG802S or LG 27GS93QE$1,122 · score 5.2
- LS32HG802S or LG 32GS95UE$1,730 · score 6.0
- LS32HG802S or LG 32U889SA-W$1,795 · score 4.5
- LS32HG802S or LG 34GX90SA$1,499 · score 4.0
- LS32HG802S or LG 39GS95QE$1,860 · score 3.6
- LS32HG802S or LG 45GS95QE$2,138 · score 3.8
- LS32HG802S or LG 45GX950A$1,700 · score 3.5
- LS32HG802S or LG 49U950A$1,900 · score 2.0
- LS32HG802S or LG DISPLAYHDR1000$1,230 · score 5.7
- LS32HG802S or MSI 321CURX$1,300 · score 5.8
- LS32HG802S or MSI 321UP$1,160 · score 5.9
- LS32HG802S or MSI 322URX$1,250 · score 5.8
- LS32HG802S or MSI 341CQR$1,300 · score 4.7
- LS32HG802S or MSI H27T22C$1,200 · score 5.3
- LS32HG802S or Samsung LS27DG602S$1,200 · score 5.5
- LS32HG802S or Samsung LS27FG900X$1,498 · score 6.4
- LS32HG802S or Samsung LS27HG702S$1,350 · score 5.1
- LS32HG802S or Samsung LS32FM900S$2,000 · score 4.1
- LS32HG802S or Samsung LS32HG730S$1,500 · score 5.2
- LS32HG802S or Samsung LS49F954UA$1,575 · score 3.7
- LS32HG802S or Samsung LS49FG910E$1,517 · score 4.1
- LS32HG802S or TCL LD2304$3,500 · score 4.3
- LS32HG802S or ViewSonic XG341C$2,051 · score 4.8
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.