Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

LG 32U830SA or MSI 271QP?

32U830SA costs $30 less today; MSI 271QP has score 0.9 higher (4.7 vs. 3.8).

LG 32U830SA

3.8score

MSI 271QP

4.7score · higher

LG wins 2by componentMSI wins 0

  • 4.5Image3.6
  • ·Smoothness8.5
  • 2.0Connections2.0
  • 4.0Ergonomics3.0

LG 32U830SA is $30 the cheaper

$700

today

No history yet

$730

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

32U830SA wins on ergonomics.

  • 4.5Image3.6
  • N/ASmoothness8.5
  • 2.0Connections2.0
  • 4.0 (wins)Ergonomics3.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

32U830SA
MSI 271QP

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

Math32U830SAMSI 271QP
Price per inch$21.87 menor$27.04

Spec sheet side by side

Item32U830SAMSI 271QP
Screen
Type changesGeneral use and officeGaming (144 Hz or more)
Size changes32 ″27 ″
Resolution changes4KQHD
Pixel density changes138 ppi109 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Stated HDR changesnot listedHDR
Line changesSmart MonitorMAG
Smoothness
Refresh rate changesnot listed280 Hz
Response time (stated) changesnot listed3 ms
Connections
HDMI ports changesnot listed1
USB-C changesYesnot listed
Ergonomics
Height adjustment changesYesnot listed
VESA mount holes changesnot listedYes
General
Model code changes32U830SA271QP
How we choose

Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.