Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Updated today

Acer XZ342CU or Samsung LS32DG702E?

  • Price todayboth cost the same$860
  • Higher spec sheet scoreAcer XZ342CU5.4 vs. 4.7

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Score by component, side by side

Acer XZ342CU wins on smoothness and connections; LS32DG702E wins on image.

  • 2.7Image6.0 (wins)
  • 9.5 (wins)Smoothness4.7
  • 5.0 (wins)Connections3.0
  • N/AErgonomics3.0

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Acer XZ342CU
LS32DG702E

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathAcer XZ342CULS32DG702E
Price per inch$25.29 menor$26.87

Ficha técnica lado a lado

ItemAcer XZ342CULS32DG702E
Screen
Type changesUltrawide (21:9 or 32:9)Gaming (144 Hz or more)
Size changes34 ″32 ″
Resolution changesUWQHD4K
Pixel density changes110 ppi138 ppi
Aspect ratio changes21:916:9
Curved screen changesYesnot listed
Stated HDR changesnot listedHDR 400
Line changesNitroOdyssey G7
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes180 Hz144 Hz
Response time (stated)1 ms1 ms
Sync changesFreeSyncGsync
Connections
HDMI ports changes1not listed
DisplayPort ports11
Ergonomics
VESA mount holes changesnot listedYes
General
Model code changesXZ342CULS32DG702E

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.