Acer XV275U
Today
Typical price$403
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.5 de 10 na ficha técnica +0.4
Buy on AmazonUpdated today
Acer XV275U or MSI 274QPF?
- Cheapest todayMSI 274QPF$3 less
- Higher spec sheet scoreAcer XV275U5.5 vs. 5.1
MSI 274QPF
Today
Typical price$400
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.1 de 10 na ficha técnica
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Score by component, side by side
Acer XV275U wins on connections; MSI 274QPF wins on image.
- 2.6Image3.6 (wins)
- 10.0Smoothness10.0
- 5.0 (wins)Connections2.0
- N/AErgonomics3.0
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 06/11/2026
Acer XV275U
- Amazon Lowest price$403Buy on Amazon
MSI 274QPF
- Amazon Lowest price$400Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | Acer XV275U | MSI 274QPF |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $14.92 | $14.81 menor |
Ficha técnica lado a lado
| Item | Acer XV275U | MSI 274QPF |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 27 ″ | 27 ″ |
| Resolution | QHD | QHD |
| Pixel density | 109 ppi | 109 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Stated HDR changes | not listed | HDR |
| Line changes | Nitro | not listed |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate | 320 Hz | 320 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 0.5 ms | 0.5 ms |
| Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | 1 | not listed |
| Ergonomics | ||
| VESA mount holes changes | not listed | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | XV275U | 274QPF |
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.