Skip to content
Laptop Radar

Updated 6 Nov, 2026

MSI Cyborg 15.6″ Core 5 210H RTX 5050 or MSI Modern 15.6″ Core 7 150U?

Modern 15.6″ Core 7 150U costs £496 less today; Cyborg 15.6″ Core 5 210H RTX 5050 has score 0.2 higher (6.7 vs. 6.5).

MSI Cyborg 15.6″ Core 5 210H RTX 5050 wins 1by componentMSI Modern 15.6″ Core 7 150U wins 1

  • 7.2Performance7.8
  • 7.3Memory and storage7.3
  • 7.4Screen5.5
  • 2.5Ports and how current it is2.5

MSI Modern 15.6″ Core 7 150U is £496 the cheaper

£985

today

No history yet

£489

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Cyborg 15.6″ Core 5 210H RTX 5050 wins on screen.

  • 7.2Performance7.8
  • 7.3Memory and storage7.3
  • 7.4 (wins)Screen5.5
  • 2.5Ports and how current it is2.5

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Spec sheet side by side

ItemCyborg 15.6″ Core 5 210H RTX 5050Modern 15.6″ Core 7 150U
Performance
Processor changesCore 5Core 7
Processor model changes210H150U
Dedicated graphics card changesRTX 5050not listed
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage512 GB512 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD
Screen
Size15.6 polegadas15.6 polegadas
ResolutionFull HDFull HD
Screen type changesIPSnot listed
Refresh rate changes144Hznot listed
General
SystemWindowsWindows
Model code changes210H150U

Other comparisons

See more 15 comparisons
How we choose

Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the laptop; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure real-world performance or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.