Apple MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max
Today
Typical price£4,858
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
9.4 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.9
Buy on AmazonApple MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max or Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 16″ Core Ultra 7 255H RTX 5060?
ROG Zephyrus G16 16″ Core Ultra 7 255H RTX 5060 costs £2,858 less today; MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max has score 0.9 higher (9.4 vs. 8.5).
Apple MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max
9.4score · higher
Apple wins 2by componentAsus wins 1
- 10.0Performance8.6
- 9.9Memory and storage8.3
- 9.3Screen9.2
- 6.3Ports and how current it is7.5
Apple MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max is the cheaperAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 16″ Core Ultra 7 255H RTX 5060 is £2,858 the cheaper
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max wins on performance and memory and storage; ROG Zephyrus G16 16″ Core Ultra 7 255H RTX 5060 wins on ports and how current it is.
- 10.0 (wins)Performance8.6
- 9.9 (wins)Memory and storage8.3
- 9.3Screen9.2
- 6.3Ports and how current it is7.5 (wins)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 16″ Core Ultra 7 255H RTX 5060
Today
Typical price£2,000
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
8.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 06/11/2026
MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max
- Amazon Lowest price£4,858Buy on Amazon
ROG Zephyrus G16 16″ Core Ultra 7 255H RTX 5060
- Amazon Lowest price£2,000Buy on Amazon
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max | ROG Zephyrus G16 16″ Core Ultra 7 255H RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Processor changes | Apple M5 Max | Core Ultra 7 |
| Processor model changes | M5 Max | 255H |
| Dedicated graphics card changes | not listed | RTX 5060 |
| RAM changes | 48 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage changes | 2,048 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type | SSD | SSD |
| Screen | ||
| Size changes | 16.2 polegadas | 16 polegadas |
| Resolution changes | 3K | QHD |
| Screen type | OLED | OLED |
| Refresh rate changes | not listed | 240Hz |
| Connections | ||
| Wi-Fi generation changes | Wi-Fi 7 | not listed |
| General | ||
| System changes | not listed | Windows |
| Model code changes | not listed | GU605CM |
Other comparisons
MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max orAcer Predator Helios Neo 18″ Core Ultra 9 275HX RTX 5070 Ti£1,899 · score 8.9Compare
ROG Zephyrus G16 16″ Core Ultra 7 255H RTX 5060 orAcer Predator Helios Neo 16″ Core Ultra 9 275HX RTX 5070 Ti£1,852 · score 8.9Compare
MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max orApple MacBook Pro 14.2″ Apple M5 Pro£2,199 · score 9.1Compare
MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max orApple MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Pro£2,650 · score 9.1Compare
MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max orAsus ROG Strix 16″ Core i9-14900HX RTX 4070£2,086 · score 8.2Compare
MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max orAsus ROG Strix 18″ Core Ultra 9 290HX RTX 5070 Ti£2,900 · score 9.1Compare
See more 5 comparisons
- MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max or Asus TUF Gaming A16 16″ Ryzen 9 8940HX RTX 5070£2,000 · score 8.2
- MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max or HP Elitebook 16″ Core Ultra 7 256V£1,507 · score 7.2
- MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max or Lenovo LOQ Gen 10 15.6″ Core i7-13700HX RTX 5060£1,790 · score 7.7
- MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max or MSI Katana 15 HX 15.6″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060£1,607 · score 8.2
- MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max or MSI Katana 15 HX 15.6″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5070£1,599 · score 8.4
How we choose
Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the laptop; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure real-world performance or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.