Skip to content
Laptop Radar

Updated 6 Nov, 2026

Alienware 15 15.3″ Core 7 RTX 5060 or Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16″ Core Ultra 7 155H RTX 4050?

IdeaPad Pro 5 16″ Core Ultra 7 155H RTX 4050 costs £19 less today and also has score 0.1 higher (7.3 vs. 7.2).

Alienware wins 0by componentLenovo wins 1

  • 8.2Performance8.0
  • 7.3Memory and storage7.3
  • 7.8Screen7.5
  • 2.5Ports and how current it is5.0

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16″ Core Ultra 7 155H RTX 4050 is £19 the cheaper

£1,409

today

No history yet

£1,390

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

IdeaPad Pro 5 16″ Core Ultra 7 155H RTX 4050 wins on ports and how current it is.

  • 8.2Performance8.0
  • 7.3Memory and storage7.3
  • 7.8Screen7.5
  • 2.5Ports and how current it is5.0 (wins)

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Spec sheet side by side

Item15 15.3″ Core 7 RTX 5060IdeaPad Pro 5 16″ Core Ultra 7 155H RTX 4050
Performance
Processor changesCore 7Core Ultra 7
Processor model changesnot listed155H
Dedicated graphics card changesRTX 5060RTX 4050
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage512 GB512 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD
Screen
Size changes15.3 polegadas16 polegadas
Resolution changesFull HDQHD
Refresh rate changes165Hznot listed
General
SystemWindowsWindows
Model code changesDA15260155H

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the laptop; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure real-world performance or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.