Skip to content
TV Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Samsung QN65LST7DAFXZA 65″ or Samsung QN65QN900D 65″?

QN65LST7DAFXZA 65″ costs $500 less today; QN65QN900D 65″ has score 0.4 higher (8.3 vs. 7.9).

Samsung QN65LST7DAFXZA 65″ wins 0by componentSamsung QN65QN900D 65″ wins 1

  • 7.8Image8.5
  • 8.5System8.5
  • 9.0Audio9.0
  • 5.0Recency5.0

Samsung QN65LST7DAFXZA 65″ is $500 cheaper

$4,498

today

No history yet

$4,998

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Neither one opens a 1-point lead on any component.

  • 7.8Image8.5
  • 8.5System8.5
  • 9.0Audio9.0
  • 5.0Recency5.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

QN65LST7DAFXZA 65″
QN65QN900D 65″

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathQN65LST7DAFXZA 65″QN65QN900D 65″
Price per inch$69.20 menor$76.89

Spec sheet side by side

ItemQN65LST7DAFXZA 65″QN65QN900D 65″
Screen
Size65 inches65 inches
Resolution changes4K8K
Panel technology changesQLEDMini LED
Sound and system
Dolby AtmosYesYes
SystemTizenTizen
General
Release20242024
How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the TV; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure real contrast or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.