Panasonic Z95BP 55″
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
8.9 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonUpdated Nov 6, 2026
S95F 55″ costs $252 less today and also has score 0.2 higher (9.1 vs. 8.9).
8.9score
9.1score · higher
Panasonic wins 0by componentSamsung wins 1
Panasonic Z95BP 55″ is cheaperSamsung S95F 55″ is $252 cheaper
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Both work. Samsung S95F 55″ is $252 cheaper.
Both work. Samsung S95F 55″ is $252 cheaper.
Both work. Samsung S95F 55″ is $252 cheaper.
Neither one fits: TVs for gaming, TVs for the bedroom and kitchen, TVs for a big or bright room.
S95F 55″ wins on system.
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
8.9 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAmazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
9.1 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.2
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Updated 06/11/2026
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the TV; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure real contrast or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.