134% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 14 models with a score between 5.2 and 6.2 have a median price of $427.
Updated Nov 6, 2026
$1,000
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
5.7out of 10
On 06/11, the lowest price for the monitor Samsung LS49CG954E was $1,000 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price changes throughout the day: the current lowest price and the last 30 days of history are updated in real time on Monitor Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 06/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is $1,000.
Updated 06/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 5.7 of 10 Above the median on 2 componentes, below on 1.
No data on the spec sheet: connections and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
134% above
The 14 models with a score between 5.2 and 6.2 have a median price of $427.
#5 of 10
Among the 10 models in the Over $800 range, the median score is 5.0.
+4.0 in ergonomics
Height adjustment, pivot (rotates to portrait mode) and VESA mount holes for a stand above what the range delivers.
1 weakness
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$20.41 per inch
The 18 models from 43 to 52 inches cost $18.11 per inch (median). Math: $1,000 ÷ 49 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Higher score, similar price
MSI 272URX wins on image (6.0 vs. 2.6)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
Samsung LS49CG954E wins on ergonomics (7.0 vs. 3.0)
Compare side by sideMSI
322URX$959
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
LG
39GX90SA$1,000
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
MSI
322UR$1,100
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | Ultrawide (21:9 or 32:9) |
| Size | 49 ″ |
| Resolution | DQHD |
| Pixel density | 109 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 32:9 |
| Curved screen | Yes |
| Line | Odyssey G9 |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 1 ms |
| Sync | FreeSync |
| Ergonomics | |
| Height adjustment | Yes |
| VESA mount holes | Yes |
| General | |
| Model code | LS49CG954E |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, stated hdr, response time measurement, hdmi ports, displayport ports, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, pivot (portrait mode), color and release year.
In November 6, 2026, Samsung LS49CG954E costs $1,000 (score 5.7); the range median is $979 across 10 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
On Nov 6, 2026, the collected price of Samsung LS49CG954E is $1,000. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 14 models with a score between 5.2 and 6.2 have a median price of $427, and Samsung LS49CG954E costs $1,000, 134% above. In the Over $800 range, the median score of the 10 models is 5.0; Samsung LS49CG954E's is 5.7, above the median, the 5º among them. By the specs, the strong point is Ergonomics (7.0, vs. 3.0 at the range median) and the weak one is Image (2.6, vs. 4.5 at the range median). The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
The catalog confirms curved screen and height adjustment. Not confirmed in the specs: 144 Hz or more, QHD, 4K, IPS, OLED and USB-C. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.