41% below
Costs half what others charge for this score
The 26 models with a score between 2.0 and 3.0 have a median price of $169.
Updated Nov 12, 2026
$100
checked today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
2.5out of 10
On 12/11, the best price of the day for the monitor Philips 271V8LB was $100 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price and the cheapest store change all the time; here you see the best one from the last check (in 12/11). The price shown is the one from the last check.
Updated 12/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 2.5 of 10 At the median or below, tiedthe in 2, below on 1.
No data on the spec sheet: connections and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, it depends on how you use it: the reasons, compared with the rest of the catalog:
41% below
The 26 models with a score between 2.0 and 3.0 have a median price of $169.
#23 of 23
Among the 23 models in the Under $100 range, the median score is 3.6.
1 weakness
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$3.70 per inch
The 247 models from 24 to 30 inches cost $7.09 per inch (median). Math: $100 ÷ 27 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Higher score, similar price
Sceptre FWT240 wins on smoothness (7.0 vs. 4.7)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
BenQ
EX251$100
checked today
Who it’s forCompetitive gaming
Pros41% below similar · Sound
LG
24U411A$100
checked today
Who it’s forTwo monitors · Work and study
Pros34% below similar
Cons120 Hz · below average
MSI
272FB$106
checked today
Who it’s forCompetitive gaming
Pros54% below similar
Cons82 ppi · below average
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | General use and office |
| Size | 27 ″ |
| Resolution | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 82 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| Ergonomics | |
| VESA mount holes | Yes |
| General | |
| Model code | 271V8LB |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, curved screen, stated hdr, line, response time (stated), response time measurement, sync, hdmi ports, displayport ports, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), color and release year.
In November 12, 2026, Philips 271V8LB costs $100 (score 2.5); the range median is $88 across 23 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
Today's best price is $100, checked in 12/11.
On Nov 12, 2026, the collected price of Philips 271V8LB is $100. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts in its favor: the 26 models with a score between 2.0 and 3.0 have a median price of $169, and Philips 271V8LB costs $100, 41% below. In the Under $100 range, the median score of the 23 models is 3.6; Philips 271V8LB's is 2.5, below the previous check, the 23º among them. By the spec sheet, the weak point is Image (0.8, vs. 2.0 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point above the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.