Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 12, 2026

LG 32U631A or MSI 32CQ6F?

Cost the same today; MSI 32CQ6F has score 1.1 higher (4.5 vs. 3.4).

LG 32U631A

3.4score

MSI 32CQ6F

4.5score · higher

LG wins 1by componentMSI wins 2

  • 2.5Image1.5
  • 5.7Smoothness7.0
  • 2.0Connections6.0
  • ·Ergonomics7.0

The best for each use

By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.

Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

LG 32U631A wins on image; MSI 32CQ6F wins on smoothness and connections.

  • 2.5 (wins)Image1.5
  • 5.7Smoothness7.0 (wins)
  • 2.0Connections6.0 (wins)
  • N/AErgonomics7.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 12/11/2026

LG 32U631A
MSI 32CQ6F

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathLG 32U631AMSI 32CQ6F
Price per inch$7.81$7.81

Spec sheet side by side

ItemLG 32U631AMSI 32CQ6F
Screen
Type changesGeneral use and officeGaming (144 Hz or more)
Size32 ″32 ″
ResolutionQHDQHD
Pixel density92 ppi92 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Stated HDR changesHDR10not listed
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes100 Hz180 Hz
Response time (stated) changes5 ms0.5 ms
Sync changesnot listedFreeSync
Connections
HDMI ports11
DisplayPort ports changesnot listed1
Built-in speaker changesnot listedYes
Ergonomics
Height adjustment changesnot listedYes
VESA mount holes changesnot listedYes
General
Model code changes32U631A32CQ6F

Other comparisons

See more 4 comparisons
How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.