LG 32GX870A
Today
Previous check$820
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.7 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonLG 32GX870A or MSI 321URXW?
32GX870A costs $48 less today; MSI 321URXW has score 1.9 higher (7.6 vs. 5.7).
LG 32GX870A
5.7score
MSI 321URXW
7.6score · higher
LG wins 0by componentMSI wins 2
- 4.5Image7.0
- 8.5Smoothness8.5
- ·Connections6.0
- 3.0Ergonomics10.0
LG 32GX870A is $48 the cheaperMSI 321URXW is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Both work. LG 32GX870A is $48 cheaper.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)
Only MSI 321URXW works: QHD or 4K with an IPS or OLED panel.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
MSI 321URXW wins on image and ergonomics.
- 4.5Image7.0 (wins)
- 8.5Smoothness8.5
- N/AConnections6.0
- 3.0Ergonomics10.0 (wins)
MSI 321URXW
Today
Previous check$868
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
7.6 out of 10 on the spec sheet +1.9
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
32GX870A
- Amazon Lowest price$820Buy on Amazon
MSI 321URXW
- Amazon Lowest price$868Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | 32GX870A | MSI 321URXW |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $25.62 menor | $27.12 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | 32GX870A | MSI 321URXW |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 32 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 138 ppi |
| Panel changes | not listed | OLED |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | not listed | No |
| Line changes | UltraGear | not listed |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 3 ms | 3 ms |
| Sync changes | FreeSync | Adaptive-Sync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| Built-in speaker changes | not listed | Yes |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | not listed | Yes |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | not listed | Yes |
| VESA mount holes | Yes | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | 32GX870A | 321URXW |
Other comparisons
32GX870A orMSI 322UR$1,072 · score 5.9Compare
MSI 321URXW orLG 52G930B$1,700 · score 6.8Compare
32GX870A orMSI 322URX$976 · score 5.8Compare- MSI 321URXW orMSI 322UR$1,072 · score 5.9Compare
32GX870A orMSI 272URX$865 · score 6.6Compare- MSI 321URXW orMSI 322URX$976 · score 5.8Compare
See more 4 comparisons
- 32GX870A or Samsung LS25BG402ENXGO$230 · score 5.2
- MSI 321URXW or Asus PA279CDV$699 · score 6.0
- MSI 321URXW or BenQ EX271U$370 · score 6.1
- MSI 321URXW or MSI 274URDFW$489 · score 6.5
How we choose
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.