Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

LG 32GX870A or MSI 322URX?

32GX870A costs $99 less today; MSI 322URX has score 0.1 higher (5.8 vs. 5.7).

LG 32GX870A

5.7score

MSI 322URX

5.8score · higher

LG wins 0by componentMSI wins 0

  • 4.5Image4.5
  • 8.5Smoothness8.5
  • ·Connections6.0
  • 3.0Ergonomics3.0

LG 32GX870A is $99 the cheaper

$860

today

No history yet

$959

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Neither one opens a 1-point lead on any component.

  • 4.5Image4.5
  • 8.5Smoothness8.5
  • N/AConnections6.0
  • 3.0Ergonomics3.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

32GX870A
MSI 322URX

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

Math32GX870AMSI 322URX
Price per inch$26.87 menor$29.97

Spec sheet side by side

Item32GX870AMSI 322URX
Screen
TypeGaming (144 Hz or more)Gaming (144 Hz or more)
Size32 ″32 ″
Resolution4K4K
Pixel density138 ppi138 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Line changesUltraGearnot listed
Smoothness
Refresh rate240 Hz240 Hz
Response time (stated)3 ms3 ms
Sync changesFreeSyncnot listed
Connections
HDMI ports changesnot listed1
DisplayPort ports changesnot listed1
Built-in speaker changesnot listedYes
Ergonomics
VESA mount holesYesYes
General
Model code changes32GX870A322URX
How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.