Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 12, 2026

LG 32GX870A or MSI 321CURX?

32GX870A costs $59 less today, with the same spec sheet score (5.7).

LG 32GX870A

5.7score

MSI 321CURX

5.7score

LG wins 0by componentMSI wins 1

  • 4.5Image4.5
  • 8.5Smoothness8.5
  • ·Connections5.0
  • 3.0Ergonomics4.0

LG 32GX870A is $59 the cheaper

$820

$837

2% below the previous check

The best for each use

By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.

Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

MSI 321CURX wins on ergonomics.

  • 4.5Image4.5
  • 8.5Smoothness8.5
  • N/AConnections5.0
  • 3.0Ergonomics4.0 (wins)

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 12/11/2026

32GX870A
MSI 321CURX

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

Math32GX870AMSI 321CURX
Price per inch$25.62 menor$27.47

Spec sheet side by side

Item32GX870AMSI 321CURX
Screen
TypeGaming (144 Hz or more)Gaming (144 Hz or more)
Size32 ″32 ″
Resolution4K4K
Pixel density138 ppi138 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Line changesUltraGearnot listed
Smoothness
Refresh rate240 Hz240 Hz
Response time (stated)3 ms3 ms
Sync changesFreeSyncG-SYNC
Connections
HDMI ports changesnot listed1
DisplayPort ports changesnot listed1
Ergonomics
Height adjustment changesnot listedYes
VESA mount holes changesYesnot listed
General
Model code changes32GX870A321CURX

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.