BenQ MA320U
Today
Previous check$650
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
3.2 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonBenQ MA320U or LG 32GX850A?
BenQ MA320U costs $102 less today; 32GX850A has score 3.3 higher (6.5 vs. 3.2).
BenQ MA320U
3.2score
LG 32GX850A
6.5score · higher
BenQ wins 0by componentLG wins 4
- 4.5Image7.0
- 0.0Smoothness4.8
- 3.0Connections6.0
- 7.0Ergonomics10.0
BenQ MA320U is $102 the cheaperLG 32GX850A is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Only LG 32GX850A works: 120 Hz or more, 25″ to 32″.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)
Only LG 32GX850A works: QHD or 4K with an IPS or OLED panel.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
32GX850A wins on image, smoothness, connections and ergonomics.
- 4.5Image7.0 (wins)
- 0.0Smoothness4.8 (wins)
- 3.0Connections6.0 (wins)
- 7.0Ergonomics10.0 (wins)
LG 32GX850A
Today
Previous check$752
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet +3.3
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
BenQ MA320U
- Amazon Lowest price$650Buy on Amazon
32GX850A
- Amazon Lowest price$752Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | BenQ MA320U | 32GX850A |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $20.31 menor | $23.50 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | BenQ MA320U | 32GX850A |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type changes | General use and office | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 32 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 138 ppi |
| Panel changes | not listed | OLED |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen | No | No |
| Line changes | not listed | UltraGear |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 60 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | not listed | 3 ms |
| Response time measurement changes | not listed | GtG |
| Sync changes | not listed | G-SYNC |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| USB-C changes | Yes | not listed |
| USB-C with laptop charging changes | Yes | not listed |
| Built-in speaker changes | not listed | Yes |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | Yes | Yes |
| Pivot (portrait mode) | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount holes changes | not listed | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | MA320U | 32GX850A |
Other comparisons
How we choose
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.