Asus XG27UCG
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.2 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonUpdated Nov 12, 2026
Asus XG27UCG costs $61 less today; MSI 271QP has score 0.7 higher (4.9 vs. 4.2).
4.2score
4.9score · higher
Asus wins 1by componentMSI wins 2
Asus XG27UCG is $61 the cheaperMSI 271QP is the cheaper
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Both work. Asus XG27UCG is $61 cheaper.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
Asus XG27UCG wins on image; MSI 271QP wins on smoothness and connections.
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.2 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAmazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.9 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.7
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Updated 12/11/2026
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | Asus XG27UCG | MSI 271QP |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $16.26 menor | $18.52 |
| Item | Asus XG27UCG | MSI 271QP |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 27 ″ | 27 ″ |
| Resolution changes | 4K | QHD |
| Pixel density changes | 163 ppi | 109 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Line changes | ROG | not listed |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 160 Hz | 280 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | not listed | 3 ms |
| Sync changes | G-SYNC | not listed |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| USB-C changes | Yes | not listed |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | not listed | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | XG27UCG | 271QP |
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.