Asus VG34WQML5A
Today
Previous check$330
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet +1.0
Buy on AmazonAsus VG34WQML5A or LG 34G600A?
LG 34G600A costs $50 less today; VG34WQML5A has score 1.0 higher (6.5 vs. 5.5).
Asus VG34WQML5A
6.5score · higher
LG 34G600A
5.5score
Asus wins 2by componentLG wins 0
- 3.6Image3.6
- 10.0Smoothness5.5
- 7.0Connections6.0
- 7.0Ergonomics7.0
- ·Recency8.5
Asus VG34WQML5A is the cheaperLG 34G600A is $50 the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Both work. LG 34G600A is $50 cheaper.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for casual gaming and console, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
VG34WQML5A wins on smoothness and connections.
- 3.6Image3.6
- 10.0 (wins)Smoothness5.5
- 7.0 (wins)Connections6.0
- 7.0Ergonomics7.0
- N/ARecency8.5
LG 34G600A
Today
Previous check$280
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
VG34WQML5A
- Amazon Lowest price$330Buy on Amazon
LG 34G600A
- Amazon Lowest price$280Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | VG34WQML5A | LG 34G600A |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $9.71 | $8.24 menor |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | VG34WQML5A | LG 34G600A |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type changes | Ultrawide (21:9 or 32:9) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 34 ″ | 34 ″ |
| Resolution | QHD | QHD |
| Pixel density | 86 ppi | 86 ppi |
| Panel | VA | VA |
| Aspect ratio changes | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen | Yes | Yes |
| Stated HDR changes | HDR | HDR10 |
| Line changes | UltraWide | UltraGear |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 250 Hz | 160 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 0.5 ms | 1 ms |
| Response time measurement changes | not listed | MPRT |
| Sync changes | FreeSync Premium | FreeSync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | 2 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | 2 | 1 |
| Built-in speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | Yes | Yes |
| Pivot (portrait mode) | No | No |
| VESA mount holes | Yes | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | VG34WQML5A | 34G600A |
| Release year changes | not listed | 2025 |
Other comparisons
VG34WQML5A orDell AW3425DWM$348 · score 4.8Compare
LG 34G600A orAsus VG34VQ3B$326 · score 5.7Compare
VG34WQML5A orInnocn 34C1R$277 · score 4.4Compare
LG 34G600A orLG 34U530A$230 · score 2.3Compare
LG 34G600A orMSI 342CQRF$290 · score 5.2Compare
VG34WQML5A orLG 34G630A$350 · score 4.9Compare
See more 17 comparisons
- LG 34G600A or MSI MD342CQPW$340 · score 5.1
- VG34WQML5A or LG 34SR60QC-W$340 · score 4.5
- LG 34G600A or MSI MP341CQPHG$300 · score 5.7
- VG34WQML5A or LG 34SR63QA$373 · score 1.9
- LG 34G600A or BenQ EX271U$370 · score 6.1
- VG34WQML5A or LG 34U530A$230 · score 2.3
- LG 34G600A or Dell AW3425DWM$348 · score 4.8
- VG34WQML5A or LG 34U650A$386 · score 3.7
- LG 34G600A or Sceptre E225W$63 · score 2.9
- VG34WQML5A or LG 34WR55QK$295 · score 3.2
- VG34WQML5A or MSI 342CQRF$290 · score 5.2
- VG34WQML5A or MSI 346CQDF$288 · score 5.2
- VG34WQML5A or MSI MAG342CQR$309 · score 4.4
- VG34WQML5A or MSI MP341CQ$230 · score 4.3
- VG34WQML5A or MSI MP341CQW$235 · score 4.3
- VG34WQML5A or Philips 34E1C5600HE$370 · score 2.4
- VG34WQML5A or ViewSonic VX3418C$290 · score 5.3
How we choose
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.