Asus VG34WQML5A
Today
Previous check$330
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet +2.1
Buy on AmazonAsus VG34WQML5A or Innocn 34C1R?
Innocn 34C1R costs $53 less today; VG34WQML5A has score 2.1 higher (6.5 vs. 4.4).
Asus VG34WQML5A
6.5score · higher
Innocn 34C1R
4.4score
Asus wins 4by componentInnocn wins 0
- 3.6Image2.1
- 10.0Smoothness7.0
- 7.0Connections6.0
- 7.0Ergonomics4.0
Asus VG34WQML5A is the cheaperInnocn 34C1R is $53 the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Only Asus VG34WQML5A works: 144 Hz or more and a stated 1 ms.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for casual gaming and console, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
VG34WQML5A wins on image, smoothness, connections and ergonomics.
- 3.6 (wins)Image2.1
- 10.0 (wins)Smoothness7.0
- 7.0 (wins)Connections6.0
- 7.0 (wins)Ergonomics4.0
Innocn 34C1R
Today
Previous check$277
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.4 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
VG34WQML5A
- Amazon Lowest price$330Buy on Amazon
Innocn 34C1R
- Amazon Lowest price$277Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | VG34WQML5A | Innocn 34C1R |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $9.71 | $8.16 menor |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | VG34WQML5A | Innocn 34C1R |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Ultrawide (21:9 or 32:9) | Ultrawide (21:9 or 32:9) |
| Size | 34 ″ | 34 ″ |
| Resolution | QHD | QHD |
| Pixel density | 86 ppi | 86 ppi |
| Panel changes | VA | not listed |
| Aspect ratio | 21:9 | 21:9 |
| Curved screen changes | Yes | not listed |
| Stated HDR | HDR | HDR |
| Line | UltraWide | UltraWide |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 250 Hz | 180 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 0.5 ms | not listed |
| Sync changes | FreeSync Premium | G-SYNC |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | 2 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | 2 | 1 |
| Built-in speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | Yes | Yes |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | No | not listed |
| VESA mount holes changes | Yes | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | VG34WQML5A | 34C1R |
Other comparisons
VG34WQML5A orDell AW3425DWM$348 · score 4.8Compare
Innocn 34C1R orLG 34G630A$350 · score 4.9Compare
Innocn 34C1R orMSI MP341CQW$235 · score 4.3Compare
VG34WQML5A orLG 34G600A$280 · score 5.5Compare
Innocn 34C1R orSamsung LS34A654UBNXGO$406 · score 2.4Compare- VG34WQML5A orLG 34G630A$350 · score 4.9Compare
See more 15 comparisons
- Innocn 34C1R or Asus XG27ACMG$269 · score 4.4
- VG34WQML5A or LG 34SR60QC-W$340 · score 4.5
- Innocn 34C1R or BenQ EX271U$370 · score 6.1
- VG34WQML5A or LG 34SR63QA$373 · score 1.9
- Innocn 34C1R or MSI MP242LE$90 · score 4.1
- VG34WQML5A or LG 34U530A$230 · score 2.3
- VG34WQML5A or LG 34U650A$386 · score 3.7
- VG34WQML5A or LG 34WR55QK$295 · score 3.2
- VG34WQML5A or MSI 342CQRF$290 · score 5.2
- VG34WQML5A or MSI 346CQDF$288 · score 5.2
- VG34WQML5A or MSI MAG342CQR$309 · score 4.4
- VG34WQML5A or MSI MP341CQ$230 · score 4.3
- VG34WQML5A or MSI MP341CQW$235 · score 4.3
- VG34WQML5A or Philips 34E1C5600HE$370 · score 2.4
- VG34WQML5A or ViewSonic VX3418C$290 · score 5.3
How we choose
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.