Asus VG259QM5A
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.7 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonUpdated Nov 12, 2026
VG259QM5A costs $79 less today; MSI 275CQDF has score 0.4 higher (5.1 vs. 4.7).
4.7score
5.1score · higher
Asus wins 1by componentMSI wins 1
Asus VG259QM5A is $79 the cheaperMSI 275CQDF is the cheaper
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Both work. Asus VG259QM5A is $79 cheaper.
Both work. Asus VG259QM5A is $79 cheaper.
Only Asus VG259QM5A works: Full HD with 100 Hz or more.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk.
VG259QM5A wins on ergonomics; MSI 275CQDF wins on image.
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.7 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAmazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.1 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.4
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Updated 12/11/2026
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | VG259QM5A | MSI 275CQDF |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $5.96 menor | $8.44 |
| Item | VG259QM5A | MSI 275CQDF |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size changes | 25 ″ | 27 ″ |
| Resolution changes | Full HD | QHD |
| Pixel density changes | 88 ppi | 109 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Stated HDR changes | not listed | HDR |
| Line changes | TUF Gaming | not listed |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 0.3 ms | 0.5 ms |
| Sync changes | G-SYNC | FreeSync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | Yes | not listed |
| VESA mount holes changes | not listed | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | VG259QM5A | 275CQDF |
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.