Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

MSI 275CQDF or Samsung LS25BG402ENXGO?

MSI 275CQDF costs $9 less today; LS25BG402ENXGO has score 0.1 higher (5.2 vs. 5.1).

MSI 275CQDF

5.1score

Samsung LS25BG402ENXGO

5.2score · higher

MSI wins 2by componentSamsung wins 1

  • 3.6Image2.2
  • 10.0Smoothness9.5
  • 2.0Connections5.0
  • 3.0Ergonomics·

MSI 275CQDF is $9 the cheaper

$221

today

No history yet

$230

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

MSI 275CQDF wins on image; LS25BG402ENXGO wins on connections.

  • 3.6 (wins)Image2.2
  • 10.0Smoothness9.5
  • 2.0Connections5.0 (wins)
  • 3.0ErgonomicsN/A

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

MSI 275CQDF
LS25BG402ENXGO

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathMSI 275CQDFLS25BG402ENXGO
Price per inch$8.19 menor$9.20

Spec sheet side by side

ItemMSI 275CQDFLS25BG402ENXGO
Screen
Type changesGaming (144 Hz or more)Ultrawide (21:9 or 32:9)
Size changes27 ″25 ″
Resolution changesQHDFull HD
Pixel density changes109 ppi88 ppi
Aspect ratio changes16:921:9
Stated HDR changesHDRHDR10
Line changesnot listedOdyssey G4
Smoothness
Refresh rate240 Hz240 Hz
Response time (stated) changes0.5 ms1 ms
Sync changesFreeSyncG-Sync
Connections
HDMI ports11
DisplayPort ports changesnot listed1
Ergonomics
VESA mount holes changesYesnot listed
General
Model code changes275CQDFLS25BG402ENXGO

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.