Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 12, 2026

AOC Q27G3XMN or LG 27G640A?

Cost the same today; Q27G3XMN has score 0.1 higher (5.0 vs. 4.9).

AOC Q27G3XMN

5.0score · higher

LG 27G640A

4.9score

AOC wins 2by componentLG wins 2

  • 4.1Image2.6
  • 6.5Smoothness9.5
  • 5.0Connections2.0
  • 4.0Ergonomics6.0

The best for each use

By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.

Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Q27G3XMN wins on image and connections; LG 27G640A wins on smoothness and ergonomics.

  • 4.1 (wins)Image2.6
  • 6.5Smoothness9.5 (wins)
  • 5.0 (wins)Connections2.0
  • 4.0Ergonomics6.0 (wins)

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 12/11/2026

Q27G3XMN
LG 27G640A

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathQ27G3XMNLG 27G640A
Price per inch$11.11$11.11

Spec sheet side by side

ItemQ27G3XMNLG 27G640A
Screen
TypeGaming (144 Hz or more)Gaming (144 Hz or more)
Size27 ″27 ″
ResolutionQHDQHD
Pixel density109 ppi109 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Stated HDR changesHDR1000not listed
Line changesnot listedUltraGear
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes180 Hz300 Hz
Response time (stated)1 ms1 ms
Sync changesnot listedG-Sync
Connections
HDMI ports11
DisplayPort ports changes1not listed
Ergonomics
Height adjustment changesYesnot listed
Pivot (portrait mode) changesnot listedYes
VESA mount holes changesnot listedYes
General
Model code changesQ27G3XMN27G640A

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.