LG 27G640A
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.9 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonUpdated Nov 6, 2026
MSI 346CQDF costs $1 less today and also has score 0.3 higher (5.2 vs. 4.9).
4.9score
5.2score · higher
LG wins 1by componentMSI wins 2
LG 27G640A is the cheaperMSI 346CQDF is $1 the cheaper
LG 27G640A wins on ergonomics; MSI 346CQDF wins on image.
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.9 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAmazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.2 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.3
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Updated 06/11/2026
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | LG 27G640A | MSI 346CQDF |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $10.67 | $8.44 menor |
| Item | LG 27G640A | MSI 346CQDF |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type changes | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Ultrawide (21:9 or 32:9) |
| Size changes | 27 ″ | 34 ″ |
| Resolution changes | QHD | UWQHD |
| Pixel density changes | 109 ppi | 110 ppi |
| Aspect ratio changes | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Stated HDR changes | not listed | HDR |
| Line changes | UltraGear | MAG |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 300 Hz | 200 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 1 ms | 0.5 ms |
| Sync changes | G-Sync | FreeSync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | Yes | not listed |
| VESA mount holes | Yes | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | 27G640A | 346CQDF |
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.