81% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 42 models with a score between 5.0 and 6.0 have a median price of $286.
Updated Nov 12, 2026
$519
checked today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
5.5out of 10
On 12/11, the best price of the day for the monitor Asus XG27AQDMGR was $519 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price and the cheapest store change all the time; here you see the best one from the last check (in 12/11). The price shown is the one from the last check.
Updated 12/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 5.5 of 10 At the median or below, tiedthe in 2, below on 1.
No data on the spec sheet: ergonomics and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
81% above
The 42 models with a score between 5.0 and 6.0 have a median price of $286.
#8 of 25
Among the 25 models in the $400 to $800 range, the median score is 4.9.
0 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$19.22 per inch
The 247 models from 24 to 30 inches cost $7.08 per inch (median). Math: $519 ÷ 27 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Acer X27U wins on connections (7.0 vs. 5.0)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
Asus XG27AQDMG wins on smoothness (10.0 vs. 8.5)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
LG
37G800A$500
checked today
Who it’s forCompetitive gaming
Pros119 ppi · above average
MSI
271QP$500
checked today
Who it’s forCasual gaming and console
Pros109 ppi · above average
Cons3.0 ms · above average
Asus
XG27AQDMG$546
See price in the store
Who it’s forCreative work (photo and video)
Pros109 ppi · above average
ConsNo built-in speaker
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 27 ″ |
| Resolution | QHD |
| Pixel density | 109 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Stated HDR | HDR |
| Line | ROG |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 3 ms |
| Connections | |
| HDMI ports | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 |
| General | |
| Model code | XG27AQDMGR |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, curved screen, response time measurement, sync, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), vesa mount holes, color and release year.
In November 12, 2026, Asus XG27AQDMGR costs $519 (score 5.5); the range median is $650 across 25 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
Today's best price is $519, checked in 12/11.
On Nov 12, 2026, the collected price of Asus XG27AQDMGR is $519. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 42 models with a score between 5.0 and 6.0 have a median price of $286, and Asus XG27AQDMGR costs $519, 81% above. In the $400 to $800 range, the median score of the 25 models is 4.9; Asus XG27AQDMGR's is 5.5, above the previous check, the 8º among them. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
The catalog confirms 144 Hz or more and QHD. Not confirmed in the specs: 4K, IPS, OLED, USB-C, curved screen and height adjustment. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.