Skip to content
Laptop Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Apple MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max or Asus TUF Gaming A16 16″ Ryzen 7 7735HS RTX 4060?

TUF Gaming A16 16″ Ryzen 7 7735HS RTX 4060 costs $2,090 less today; MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max has score 1.7 higher (9.4 vs. 7.7).

Apple wins 3by componentAsus wins 0

  • 10.0Performance7.9
  • 9.9Memory and storage10.0
  • 9.3Screen7.8
  • 6.3Ports and how current it is2.5

Asus TUF Gaming A16 16″ Ryzen 7 7735HS RTX 4060 is $2,090 the cheaper

$4,499

today

No history yet

$2,409

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max wins on performance, screen and ports and how current it is.

  • 10.0 (wins)Performance7.9
  • 9.9Memory and storage10.0
  • 9.3 (wins)Screen7.8
  • 6.3 (wins)Ports and how current it is2.5

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Spec sheet side by side

ItemMacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 MaxTUF Gaming A16 16″ Ryzen 7 7735HS RTX 4060
Performance
Processor changesApple M5 MaxRyzen 7
Processor model changesM5 Max7735HS
Dedicated graphics card changesnot listedRTX 4060
RAM changes48 GB64 GB
Storage2,048 GB2,048 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD
Screen
Size changes16.2 polegadas16 polegadas
Resolution changes3KFull HD
Screen type changesOLEDnot listed
Refresh rate changesnot listed165Hz
Connections
Wi-Fi generation changesWi-Fi 7not listed
General
System changesnot listedWindows
Model code changesnot listedRTX4060

Other comparisons

See more 12 comparisons
How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the laptop; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure real-world performance or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.