Acer Predator Helios Neo 16″ Core Ultra 9 RTX 5070 Ti
Today
Typical price$2,200
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
8.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAcer Predator Helios Neo 16″ Core Ultra 9 RTX 5070 Ti or Apple MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M4 Pro?
Predator Helios Neo 16″ Core Ultra 9 RTX 5070 Ti costs $299 less today; MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M4 Pro has score 0.1 higher (8.6 vs. 8.5).
Apple MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M4 Pro
8.6score · higher
Acer wins 1by componentApple wins 1
- 9.5Performance9.8
- 8.3Memory and storage7.8
- 8.8Screen9.3
- 5.0Ports and how current it is5.0
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16″ Core Ultra 9 RTX 5070 Ti is $299 the cheaperApple MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M4 Pro is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Laptops for study and basic use
Both work. Acer Predator Helios Neo 16″ Core Ultra 9 RTX 5070 Ti is $299 cheaper.
Laptops for programming
Both work. Acer Predator Helios Neo 16″ Core Ultra 9 RTX 5070 Ti is $299 cheaper.
Laptops for photo and video editing
Both work. Acer Predator Helios Neo 16″ Core Ultra 9 RTX 5070 Ti is $299 cheaper.
Gaming laptops
Only Acer Predator Helios Neo 16″ Core Ultra 9 RTX 5070 Ti works: dedicated graphics card and 16 GB of RAM.
Neither one fits: Laptops for work and office, Light laptops to carry every day.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
Neither one opens a 1-point lead on any component.
- 9.5Performance9.8
- 8.3Memory and storage7.8
- 8.8Screen9.3
- 5.0Ports and how current it is5.0
Apple MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M4 Pro
Today
Typical price$2,499
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
8.6 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.1
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 10/11/2026
Predator Helios Neo 16″ Core Ultra 9 RTX 5070 Ti
- Amazon Lowest price$2,200Buy on Amazon
MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M4 Pro
- Amazon Lowest price$2,499Buy on Amazon
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | Predator Helios Neo 16″ Core Ultra 9 RTX 5070 Ti | MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Processor changes | Core Ultra 9 | Apple M4 Pro |
| Processor model changes | not listed | M4 Pro |
| Dedicated graphics card changes | RTX 5070 Ti | not listed |
| RAM changes | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage changes | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | SSD | SSD |
| Screen | ||
| Size changes | 16 polegadas | 16.2 polegadas |
| Resolution changes | QHD | 3K |
| Screen type changes | not listed | OLED |
| Refresh rate changes | 240Hz | not listed |
| Connections | ||
| Wi-Fi generation changes | Wi-Fi 6E | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | 275HX | not listed |
Other comparisons
Predator Helios Neo 16″ Core Ultra 9 RTX 5070 Ti orMSI Crosshair 18 HX 18″ Core Ultra 9 275HX RTX 5070$1,999 · score 8.7Compare
Predator Helios Neo 16″ Core Ultra 9 RTX 5070 Ti orAcer Aspire 14″ Core Ultra 9 288V$1,040 · score 8.5Compare
MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M4 Pro orAsus ROG Strix G16 16″ Core Ultra 9 290HX RTX 5080$3,900 · score 9.0Compare
Predator Helios Neo 16″ Core Ultra 9 RTX 5070 Ti orApple MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M5 Max$4,499 · score 9.4Compare- MacBook Pro 16.2″ Apple M4 Pro orAcer Aspire 14″ Core Ultra 9 288V$1,040 · score 8.5Compare
Predator Helios Neo 16″ Core Ultra 9 RTX 5070 Ti orDell XPS 14.5″ Core Ultra 7 255H$2,196 · score 8.7Compare
See more 2 comparisons
How we choose
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 10/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the laptop; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure real-world performance or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.